Skip to main content

Ajax: a big fish in a small pond

The authoritative Swiss Ramble takes a look at Ajax's 2017/18 accounts which cover a season when they finished second in the Eredivisie (for the fourth year in a row), but failed to qualify for the Champions League or Europa League group stages (the first time since 1990/91).

Profit before tax decreased from €67m to €2m (profit after tax down from €50m to €1m), largely due to profit on player sales halving from €79m to €39m and revenue dropping €26m (22%) from €118m to €92m following the lack of income from European competition. Ajax are essentially a profitable club, reporting profits in seven of the last eight years (and the only loss in 2015/16 was less than €1m). Over that period, they have accumulated €159m profits, averaging €20m a season.

All three Ajax revenue streams decreased: broadcasting fell €18m (58%) from €30m to €12m; match day was down €6m (17%) from €38m to €32m; while commercial was €2m (4%) lower at €48m. Revenue decline was partly mitigated by lower costs: wage bill cut €2m (4%) to €53m; other expenses decreased €2m (5%) to €49m; and net interest payable/receivable improved €2m.

Reflecting the relative decline of Dutch football compared to the 'big five' leagues, few clubs in the Eredivisie make big profits. In 2017/18 largest was Feyenoord €16m, thanks to Champions League money. Even though Ajax reported only €2m profit, this was still the fifth highest in the league. Six clubs are under special supervision by the KNVB due to poor finances.

Ajax are known for their strategy of developing and selling players and 2017/18 benefited from €39m profit here, mainly Davinson Sanchez to Tottenham. The previous season was even higher at €79m (Milik to Napoli, Klaasen to Everton, Cillessen to Barcelona and Bazoer to Wolfsburg).

The club are still reliant on player sales to make a profit, earning a thumping great €277m from this activity in last 10 years. If these sales were excluded, total loss would have been €148m. That said, only major 2018/19 sale currently Justin Kluivert to Roma.

Although Ajax revenue of around €100m is not too bad, it pales into insignificance compared to elite overseas clubs with Manchester United, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern Munich and Manchester City earning above €500m. Unfortunately, this revenue gap for Ajax is worsening. In 2011 their revenue was only €11m behind the 20th placed club in the Deloitte Money League, but this had widened to €81m in 2017. The gap to the top club has increased from €408m in 2011 to a colossal €658m in 2018.

To reinforce the enormous revenue disparity for Dutch clubs, the Eredivisie had €451m revenue in 16/17, less than 10% of Premier League €5.3 bln. Also miles behind Spain €2.9 bln, Germany €2.8 bln, Italy €2.1 bln and France €1.6 bln. Even below Turkey €734m & Russia €701m. For some perspective, the club finishing top of the Premier League received around €170m in broadcasting revenue, while the bottom club got €108m, i.e. 12 times as much as Ajax €9m. Basically, Ajax get the same as an English Championship club that does not benefit from parachute payments.

Average attendance remained the highest in the Eredivisie, rising by around 2,000 from 48,945 to just under 51,000. The other Dutch clubs above 20,000: Feyenoord, 45,600, PSV Eindhoven 33,300, Twente 25,100 and Heerenveen 20,300.

The Ajax wage bill of €53m is by some distance the highest in the Eredivisie, over 50% more than Feyenoord and PSV Eindhoven, both around €35m, who are in turn around twice as much as AZ, Twente and Vitesse (€17-18m). However, the Swiss Ramble concludes, 'However, for #Ajax it is a case of being “a big fish in a small pond”, as their €53m wage bill is significantly lower than the top clubs in the major leagues, e.g. only around 10% of Barcelona €487m. This makes it inevitable that their young stars will move abroad.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/