Skip to main content

Ajax: a big fish in a small pond

The authoritative Swiss Ramble takes a look at Ajax's 2017/18 accounts which cover a season when they finished second in the Eredivisie (for the fourth year in a row), but failed to qualify for the Champions League or Europa League group stages (the first time since 1990/91).

Profit before tax decreased from €67m to €2m (profit after tax down from €50m to €1m), largely due to profit on player sales halving from €79m to €39m and revenue dropping €26m (22%) from €118m to €92m following the lack of income from European competition. Ajax are essentially a profitable club, reporting profits in seven of the last eight years (and the only loss in 2015/16 was less than €1m). Over that period, they have accumulated €159m profits, averaging €20m a season.

All three Ajax revenue streams decreased: broadcasting fell €18m (58%) from €30m to €12m; match day was down €6m (17%) from €38m to €32m; while commercial was €2m (4%) lower at €48m. Revenue decline was partly mitigated by lower costs: wage bill cut €2m (4%) to €53m; other expenses decreased €2m (5%) to €49m; and net interest payable/receivable improved €2m.

Reflecting the relative decline of Dutch football compared to the 'big five' leagues, few clubs in the Eredivisie make big profits. In 2017/18 largest was Feyenoord €16m, thanks to Champions League money. Even though Ajax reported only €2m profit, this was still the fifth highest in the league. Six clubs are under special supervision by the KNVB due to poor finances.

Ajax are known for their strategy of developing and selling players and 2017/18 benefited from €39m profit here, mainly Davinson Sanchez to Tottenham. The previous season was even higher at €79m (Milik to Napoli, Klaasen to Everton, Cillessen to Barcelona and Bazoer to Wolfsburg).

The club are still reliant on player sales to make a profit, earning a thumping great €277m from this activity in last 10 years. If these sales were excluded, total loss would have been €148m. That said, only major 2018/19 sale currently Justin Kluivert to Roma.

Although Ajax revenue of around €100m is not too bad, it pales into insignificance compared to elite overseas clubs with Manchester United, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern Munich and Manchester City earning above €500m. Unfortunately, this revenue gap for Ajax is worsening. In 2011 their revenue was only €11m behind the 20th placed club in the Deloitte Money League, but this had widened to €81m in 2017. The gap to the top club has increased from €408m in 2011 to a colossal €658m in 2018.

To reinforce the enormous revenue disparity for Dutch clubs, the Eredivisie had €451m revenue in 16/17, less than 10% of Premier League €5.3 bln. Also miles behind Spain €2.9 bln, Germany €2.8 bln, Italy €2.1 bln and France €1.6 bln. Even below Turkey €734m & Russia €701m. For some perspective, the club finishing top of the Premier League received around €170m in broadcasting revenue, while the bottom club got €108m, i.e. 12 times as much as Ajax €9m. Basically, Ajax get the same as an English Championship club that does not benefit from parachute payments.

Average attendance remained the highest in the Eredivisie, rising by around 2,000 from 48,945 to just under 51,000. The other Dutch clubs above 20,000: Feyenoord, 45,600, PSV Eindhoven 33,300, Twente 25,100 and Heerenveen 20,300.

The Ajax wage bill of €53m is by some distance the highest in the Eredivisie, over 50% more than Feyenoord and PSV Eindhoven, both around €35m, who are in turn around twice as much as AZ, Twente and Vitesse (€17-18m). However, the Swiss Ramble concludes, 'However, for #Ajax it is a case of being “a big fish in a small pond”, as their €53m wage bill is significantly lower than the top clubs in the major leagues, e.g. only around 10% of Barcelona €487m. This makes it inevitable that their young stars will move abroad.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do