Skip to main content

The brand plays on

That is the conclusion of an article by Oliver Kay about Manchester United in The Times this morning. Kay argues, 'For the past five years since [Sir Alex] Ferguson's retirement, the most influential person at Old Trafford has been executive vice-chairman Ed Woodward, the investment banker who, having conceived the leveraged buy out of the club while at JP Morgan, effectively invented what United supporters grudgingly call "Glazernomics"'

Kay notes that while Woodward 'has handed over extravagant transfer fees and/or exorbitant contracts for players who fit is commercial vision while investing modestly in defenders.'

The Glazers' ownership of United has cost more than £1 billion in interest repayments, bond buybacks, financing costs and management fees. In 2018 Glazernomics cost a £22 million dividend for themselves and £18 million in interest charges to banks.

It cost Manchester United £4.9m to sack Moyes in 2014 and £8.4 million to sack Louis van Gaal in 2016. With 18 months left on his contract it has been estimated that it would cost £15m to get rid of Mourinho, not to mention the bill of over half a million for his hotel suite at The Lowry.

Anyway, Manchester United's stock market value increased by $175 million yesterday following Mourinho's dismissal.

David Conn discusses what has happened in the 13 years the Glazers have been in charge here: The Glazers at United

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/