Skip to main content

A quiet transfer window

The January transfer window is generally quieter than the one in the summer. It is difficult to secure value and panic purchases may not change a team's fortunes. Sometimes it makes more sense to prepare for relegation rather than spending large sums in a futile attempt to avoid it.

However, it does seem that there is a feeling this year that unrealistic sums are being asked for average players and this will lead to a quieter transfer window than usual. Some commentators think that the final sum spent could be less than a third of last year's record total.

The total spent up to deadline day this year has been £110m, compared to £280m in 2018. Last year £150m was spent on deadline day alone, but more of a flurry than a last minute splurge is anticipated for today. This year's total expected is expected to be £130m - £140m, similar to 2014 and 2015.

Clubs are looking for loan deals with the possibility of a signing in the summer. In most incoming loan deals Premier League clubs will pay 100 per cent of the player's wages and there may be success bonuses.

Speculation that Brexit may have depressed the market doesn't seem to be based on any evidence. A more important factor may be the relatively stable positions of the top six in the Premier League.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/