Skip to main content

Huge wage bills at Birmingham City

The authoritative Swiss Ramble takes a close look at the recently published accounts of Birmingham City. They have consistently lost money, only reporting a profit once in the last six seasons – and that was just £1m in 2014/15. Since then, the losses have been growing: £5m in 2015/16; £16m in 2016/17; and £37m in 2017/18. Total losses since 2008/09 are £83m.

The loss before tax more than doubled from £16.4m to a barely credible £37.4m, primarily due to massive investment in the squad: wages rose £16.1m (71%) from £22.5m to £38.6m. Of course, it is difficult for clubs in the Championship without parachute payments to compete with those who receive them. Eight clubs benefitted from them in 2017/18, three of them receiving £42m.

The only season that the club reported a significant profit in recent years was £16m in 2011/12, which was very largely due to £22m of once-off player sales (Johnson, Dann, Gardner, Beausejour, Jerome & Ridgewell). In the six years since, club only had £18m profits from this activity.

Although it is true that almost all clubs in the Championship lose money, as they strive for promotion to the top flight, the club's £37m loss is really striking. Only two clubs reported higher losses in 2016/17, Newcastle United £47m & Brighton £39m – and both paid promotion bonuses of around £10m.

Despite the 17/18 growth, revenue has dropped by more than two-thirds (£42m) to £19m in the seven years since relegation from the Premier League, very largely TV money. In the four years between 2012 and 2015, Birmingham benefited from £48m parachute payments, but these stopped in 2016.

The wage bill shot up an incredible 71% (£16.1m) from £22.5m to £38.6m in 2017/18, as the 'Redknapp effect' bit hard, though was inflated by severance payments for departing managers. In just two seasons, wages have increased by £23m (150%) with playing staff up from 64 to 107.

As a consequence, the Birmingham City £39m wage bill was one of the highest in the Championship, thanks to numerous signings and loan players. It was actually higher than Hull City’s £31m and only £3m below Norwich City £42m, even though both clubs benefited from hefty parachute payments.

To illustrate just how big the 2017/18 wage bill of £39m really is, it is actually the highest amount ever paid in the Championship by a club not in receipt of a parachute payment. Furthermore, many of the others in this list were inflated due to chunky promotion bonuses.

As a result of the wages growth, the wages to turnover ratio surged from 128% to an astonishing 202%, three times as much as 67% in 14/15. Although more than half the Championship clubs have ratios over 100%, Birmingham City are in a league of their own (the next highest is Blackburn Rovers 147%). The 2017/18 wages to turnover ratio of 202% is not quite the highest (worst) in Championship history, but it is only surpassed by Bournemouth’s 237% in 2014/15 – and that was adversely impacted by an estimated £7m promotion bonus, while Birmingham finished a lowly 19th.

Commercial income rose 6% (£0.4m) to £6.5m. This feels low, but only 10 clubs in the Championship earn more (highest Leeds United £16m). 888sport and Adidas are the principal shirt sponsors, but owners Trillion Trophy will pay 'significant' stadium naming rights from 2018/19.

Despite their many issues, the club have seen their attendance rise four years in a row from the 15,457 low point in 2013/14, which reflects very well on their supporters. In fact, the 21,042 attendance last season was the highest since they were last in the Premier League in 2010/11.

Comments

  1. The 37 million pound wage bill also includes pay offs for S Cotterill ,H Redknapp and
    Lee Carsley for their management of the club apparently!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/