Skip to main content

Rotherham reliant on owners

Rotherham United made loss of £27,000 a week in 2017/18 pre player trading. Profit of £790k on player sales (possible sell on clause?) helped offset these losses. Income was down 24% in 2017/18 following relegation to League One. It would have been a bigger drop except owners increased sponsorship from £1m to £3m.

Relegation saw a reduction of £4.8m in funding from the EFL and solidarity funding. Match day receipts were more or less steady. Total income was just under £10m.

Average league attendance was 13 per cent down on the previous year but this was largely due to a 64 per cent fall in away fans in League One. There were nearly 6,000 season ticket holders and this year there are over 6,000.

Biggest costs for Rotherham were wages of £6.3m which fell by over a quarter after relegation and rent of £1m to owners which fell by 18%. Kieran Maguire of the Priceof Football notes, 'Rotherham seem to have good control over wages as only spent £64 on wages for every £100 of income. However if take out owner sponsorship would have been £92 on wages.'

Like many clubs, Rotherham are dependent upon their owners who have lent club £3.5 million and which appears to be interest free.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow
Post a Comment
Read more

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is
Post a Comment
Read more

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/
Post a Comment
Read more