Ajax reliant on player sales to make a profit

Ajax's triumph over Real Madrid pushed the Dutch club's shares up 11 per cent to a record high. The Eurotext listed club added roughly €27m to its market capitalisation.

Ajax is the biggest team Netherlands with revenues of €92m in 2018. However, it does not make it into the top 30 of Europe's richest clubs according to Deloitte.

In 2017/18 Ajax's profit before tax decreased from €67m to €2m (profit after tax down from €50m to €1m), largely due to profit on player sales halving from €79m to €39m and revenue dropping €26m (22%) from €118m to €92m following the lack of income from European competition (figures from the authoritative Swiss Ramble).

All three Ajax revenue streams decreased: broadcasting fell €18m (58%) from €30m to €12m; match day was down €6m (17%) from €38m to €32m; while commercial was €2m (4%) lower at €48m.

Although revenue of around €100m is not too bad, it pales into insignificance compared to elite overseas clubs with Manchester United, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern and Manchester City earning above €500m. As director Edwin van der Sar said, 'We don’t have the spending power of other clubs.' The absence of European group qualification really hurt Ajax in 2017/18. They earned €20m prize money the previous season for reaching Europa League final after being eliminated in Champions League play-off.

Ajax are known for their strategy of developing and selling players and 2017/18 benefited from €39m profit here, mainly Davinson Sanchez to Tottenham. Previous season was even higher at €79m (Milik to Napoli, Klaasen to Everton, Cillessen to Barcelona and Bazoer to Wolfsburg). Unfortunately, this revenue gap for Ajax is worsening. In 2011 their revenue was only €11m behind the 20th placed club in the Deloitte Money League, but this had widened to €81m in 2017. The gap to the top club has increased from €408m in 2011 to a colossal €658m in 2018.

To reinforce the enormous revenue disparity for Dutch clubs, the Eredivisie had €451m revenue in 16/17, less than 10% of Premier League €5.3 bln. Also miles behind Spain €2.9 bln, Germany €2.8 bln, Italy €2.1 bln & France €1.6 bln. Even below Turkey €734m & Russia €701m.

Ajax are essentially a profitable club, reporting profits in seven of the last eight years (and the only loss in 2015/16 was less than €1m). Over that period, they have accumulated €159m profits, averaging €20m a season. However, Ajax are still reliant on player sales to make a profit, earning a thumping great €277m from this activity in last 10 years. If these sales were excluded, total loss would have been €148m. That said, only major 2018/19 sale currently Justin Kluivert to Roma.

The wage bill fell by €2m (4%) from €55m to €53m due to lower player bonus payments, though this is still €8m (18%) more than the €45m reported three years ago. Looked at another way, it is only €1m more than the €52m paid seven years ago in 2011. Their €53m wage bill is significantly lower than the top clubs in the major leagues, e.g. only around 10% of Barcelona €487m. This makes it inevitable that their young stars will move abroad.

If there was a genuine European Superleague based on size,success and history, Ajax would have to be in it. They are one club who would seriously benefit from it by being able to keep their players.

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month. He was approaching ninety, but still went to games. Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules. Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen. There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere: https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog