Skip to main content

Ipswich finances show the challenge they face

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has taken a look at Ipswich Town's results for 2017/18, their 16th successive season in the Championship. Their loss increased by £0.9m from £4.3m to £5.2m, as revenue dropped slightly (£0.1m) to £17.1m and profit on player sales fell £0.3m to £3.8m. Wages up £0.8m (4%) to £18.5m,

Gate receipts continued to fall, down £0.4m (8%) to £4.7m, but this was largely offset by an increase in the central TV distribution, which meant broadcasting income rose £0.3m (4%) to £8.1m. Commercial revenue was unchanged at £4.4m.

Almost all Championship clubs lose money, so Ipswich's £5m loss is actually one of the smallest of the clubs that have reported so far in 2017/18. Only four clubs made money, while seven clubs have posted losses above £20m.

The £4m profit on player sales was largely due to the transfers of Adam Webster to Bristol City and Kieffer Moore to Barnsley. This is far below the large profits clubs recently relegated from the Premier League made from this activity.

In 2017/18 Ipswich only had £436k player purchases (mainly Emyr Huws, Martyn Waghorn and Joe Garner), which was the lowest in the Championship, bringing their total for the last five years to just £3.7m. They were massively outspent by clubs like Boro £66m and Wolves £25m.

The Tractors have lost £80m since Marcus Evans bought the club in 2007, averaging an annual loss of around £7m, though these have reduced in the last five seasons. The improvement in losses is partly due to higher profits on player sales, which have more than doubled in past four seasons to £5.2m average, though most came in 2014/15 with £12m.

Gate receipts decreased £0.4m (8%) to £4.7m, as average attendance fell from 16,980 to 16,272 (with season ticket sales dropping from 12,022 to 10,144) and one home game less. One of the lowest match day incomes in the Championship, but around the same as promoted Cardiff. Crowds have slumped by over a third since the recent 25,651 peak in 2004/05, when they reached the play-offs. Since then, the only season where the attendance increased was 2014/15, when Mick McCarthy’s side also got to the play-offs.

The wage bill grew £0.8m (4%) to £18.5m with the wages to turnover ratio rising from 103% to 108%. This was the fourth year in a row that wages have climbed, but they are only £0.5m above £18.0m spent in 2012, when the wages to turnover ratio was as high as 119%.

The £18.5m wage bill was 19th highest in the Championship, way behind Villa £73m and less than half Norwich £42m. the Swiss Ramble comments, 'The substantial wages gap underlines the club’s challenge.'

Gross debt increased by £6m from £89m to £95m. It has shot up from £36m when Evans bought the club in 2007. All the debt is owed to various Marcus Evans’ companies, through a mixture of loans, convertible loan notes and preference shares, so there is no external debt. The £95m debt is the 2nd highest in the Championship, only below Boro £101m. Unlike many other football club owners, Evans has not converted any debt into equity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/