The Swiss Ramble notes, 'After that stunning performance against Juventus, it’s maybe worth remembering how well Ajax have done, given their financial challenges: revenue €92m, wages €53m.' They do, of course, have a very young side with a 19-year old captain.
Their 2017/18 accounts cover a season when they finished second in the Eredivisie (for the fourth year in a row), but failed to qualify for the Champions League or Europa League group stages (the first time since 1990/91).
Profit before tax decreased from €67m to €2m (profit after tax down from €50m to €1m), largely due to profit on player sales halving from €79m to €39m and revenue dropping €26m (22%) from €118m to €92m following the lack of income from European competition. They are essentially a profitable club, reporting profits in seven of the last eight years (and the only loss in 2015/16 was less than €1m). Over that period, they have accumulated €159m profits, averaging €20m a season.
All three Ajax revenue streams decreased: broadcasting fell €18m (58%) from €30m to €12m; match day was down €6m (17%) from €38m to €32m; while commercial was €2m (4%) lower at €48m. The revenue decline was partly mitigated by lower costs: wage bill cut €2m (4%) to €53m; other expenses decreased €2m (5%) to €49m.
Few clubs in the Eredivisie make big profits. In 2017/18 largest was Feyenoord €16m, thanks to Champions League money. Even though Ajax reported only €2m profit, this was still the fifth highest in the league. Six clubs are under special supervision by KNVB due to poor finances.
The club are known for their strategy of developing and selling players and 2017/18 benefited from €39m profit here, mainly Davinson Sanchez to Tottenham. Previous season was even higher at €79m (Milik to Napoli, Klaasen to Everton, Cillessen to Barcelona and Bazoer to Wolfsburg). They are still reliant on player sales to make a profit, earning a thumping great €277m from this activity in last 10 years. If these sales were excluded, total loss would have been €148m.
Although Ajax revenue of around €100m is not too bad, it pales into insignificance compared to elite overseas clubs with Manchester United, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern and Manchester City earning above €500m. As director Edwin van der Sar said, 'We don’t have the spending power of other clubs.' Unfortunately, this revenue gap for Ajax is worsening. In 2011 their revenue was only €11m behind the 20th placed club in the Deloitte Money League, but this had widened to €81m in 2017. The gap to the top club has increased from €408m in 2011 to a colossal €658m in 2018.
To reinforce the enormous revenue disparity for Dutch clubs, the Eredivisie had €451m revenue in 16/17, less than 10% of Premier League €5.3 bln. Also miles behind Spain €2.9 bln, Germany €2.8 bln, Italy €2.1 bln and France €1.6 bln. Even below Turkey €734m and Russia €701m.
The club receive less than €10m a season TV money from the Eredivisie, who signed a 12-year deal with Fox that started in the 2013/14 season. The distribution is based on a club’s historical performance (results over the previous 10 years), so Ajax get the most. For some perspective, the club finishing top of the Premier League received around €170m, while the bottom club got €108m, i.e. 12 times as much as Ajax €9m. Basically, Ajax get the same as an English Championship club that does not benefit from parachute payments.
Ajax average attendance remained the highest in the Eredivisie, rising by around 2,000 from 48,945 to just under 51,000. The other Dutch clubs above 20,000: Feyenoord, 45,600, PSV Eindhoven 33,300, Twente 25,100 and Heerenveen 20,300.
The wage bill fell by €2m (4%) from €55m to €53m due to lower player bonus payments, though this is still €8m (18%) more than the €45m reported three years ago. Looked at another way, it is only €1m more than the €52m paid seven years ago in 2011. thewage bill of €53m is by some distance the highest in the Eredivisie, over 50% more than Feyenoord and PSV Eindhoven. However, for Ajax it is a case of being 'a big fish in a small pond', as their €53m wage bill is significantly lower than the top clubs in the major leagues, e.g. only around 10% of Barcelona €487m. This makes it inevitable that their young stars will move abroad.
Comments
Post a Comment