Skip to main content

Decline of Bradford City is another tale of owner mismanagement

An interesting analysis of the decline of Bradford City who have been relegated to League Two: With a whimper rather than a bang

Financial losses topped £2m for the last financial year and the club’s decline on the pitch has been matched by steadily falling support, with season ticket sales having dropped by 4,000 and one home match, against Coventry City in October, attracting the club’s lowest league attendance in the last five years.

It's another story of incoming owners who thought that football success could be easily achieved: 'The owners of the club attempted to make too many changes too quickly, in spite of their initial statement when taking control of the club three years ago, whilst the apparent motivation of the man placed in control of the day-to-day running of the club seemed directed more by ego than the best interests of the club.'

'Failures in recruitment at all levels have been a clear signal of the shortcomings of the ownership, but Stefan Rupp – who had been largely an absent owner, having left the running of the club to Rahic – will presumably only leave at a time that is beneficial to him, and it’s difficult to believe that Bradford City’s value could be worth more now than he paid for his 78% shareholding in the first place at present.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/