Napoli have to sell stars to balance the books

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reports that Napoli's 2017/18 accounts posted a €3m loss before tax, compared to €101m profit prior year, as profit on player sales dropped €74m to €30m and revenue fell €18m (9%) from €204m to €185m, mainly due to worse performance in Champions League. After tax, went from €67m profit to €6m loss.

The club's €3m pre-tax loss was by no means the worst in Serie A, as seven others reported higher deficits, including the four largest clubs: Inter €10m, Juventus €10m, Roma €18m and Milan’s horrific €121m. Most profitable: Fiorentina €55m, Torino €54m, Atalanta €40m and Lazio €40m.

Napoli's €185m revenue is the fifth highest in Italy, but still less than half of Juventus’ €411m. As Sarri said, 'Juve’s turnover is too high, they make another league.' Also more than €100m below Inter €290m and behind Roma €257m and Milan €220m, but well ahead of Lazio €129m.

Napoli benefited from €30m profit on player sales, mainly Zapata to Sampdoria €20m and Pavoletti to Cagliari €4m, though much lower than €104m in 2016/17 (Higuain to Juventus €86m & Gabbiadini to Southampton €14m). Only the 10th highest in Italy, way behind Juventus €94m.

Player sales are very important to Napoli, averaging €42m in last six seasons versus only €7m in the previous four. They need to periodically sell stars to balance the books. This season will include at least €60m of gains, mainly Jorginho to Chelsea, while Koulibaly could go for €100m.

The club have now made three losses in the last four years, though have accumulated €190m profits in the last decade. Owner Aurelio De Laurentiis has said that accounts in the red represent a 'stain' on his reputation and expects the club to return to the black in 2018/19.

Revenue growth highlights the importance of Europe, particularly the Champions League. The €204m record revenue in 2016/17 was greatly influenced by €73m from this tournament. In fact, excluding European money, revenue has only grown by €27m (24%) since 2011.

Napoli have earned a healthy €171m from Europe in the last 5 seasons, only surpassed in Italy by Juventus’ €406m and Roma €227m, but comfortably ahead of Lazio €56m, Milan €52m, Fiorentina €41m and Inter €15m. the €171m revenue from European competition in the last five years is the 13th highest of all clubs over that period, ahead of the likes of Borussia Dortmund €166m, Liverpool €153m, Sevilla €150m and Tottenham €140m.

Napoli had €77m TV money from Serie A, a long way below Juventus €117m. Distribution: 40% equal share; 30% performance (5% last season, 15% last 5 years, 10% historical); 30% profile (25% supporters, 5% population). New deal from 2018/19 increases the equal share to 50%.

Average attendance rose from 36,605 to 43,050, the third highest in Italy only behind Inter 57,529 and Milan 52,690. There is a project to redevelop Stadio San Paolo, described as 'an ever increasing toilet' by the colourful president De Laurentiis.

The wage bill increased by €17m (16%) from €102m to €118m. Most of the growth came from player salaries, up €13m to €92m, and bonuses, up €3m to €12m. Wages have more than doubled in 6 years from €58m in 2012, as wages to turnover ratio rose from 38% to 64%, but still below Uefa's recommended 70 per cent level.

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month. He was approaching ninety, but still went to games. Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules. Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen. There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere: https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog