Skip to main content

West Brom make loss for first time since 2009

The authoritative Swiss Ramble examines West Bromwich Albion's accounts for 2017/18. The club made a loss before tax of £7.4m, compared to a prior year profit of £39.8m, representing a 'significant' £47m deterioration, as revenue fell £13m (10%) to £125m and profit on player sales was down £8m to £6m. After tax, the club went from a £32.3m profit to a £5.8m loss.

This was the first time that WBA have made a loss since way back in 2009, so they have been profitable eight times in the last decade. Between those two losses, the club accumulated £83m of profits, but around half of this came from 2016/17 £40m alone.

However, larger profits have been due to either high player sales (2014 and 2017) or exceptionals (£8m debt waived 2011). In fact, total £64m profit in last 10 years includes £63m from player sales. 2018/19 will include £16m proceeds (Chadli, McClean and Foster).

The £13m revenue fall was very largely driven by broadcasting’s £17m (14%) decrease from £119m to £102m, due to less prize money for finishing bottom. In contrast, commercial rose £2.9m (23%) from £12.4m to £15.3m and gate receipts were up £0.7m (10%) to £7.4m. TV money from Premier League fell £19m from £114m to £95m, as finishing 20th compared to 10th previous season meant a much lower merit payment (£2m instead of £21m).

Nevertheless, a hefty 82% of revenue came from TV (£102m out of £125m), though in fairness it should be noted that no fewer than 12 of the 20 Premier League clubs get more than 75% of their income from this source, with Bournemouth 'leading the way' with an amazing 89%.

The £125m was the lowest revenue in the Premier League, just below Huddersfield Town £125m, Swansea City £127m, Stoke City £127m and Watford £128m. For more context, they were a quarter of a billion below 6th placed Tottenham.

WBA only made £6m profit on player sales, including Jonny Evans to Leicester City, compared to £14m prior year (Berahino to Stoke City and Chester to Villa). This was one of the lowest gains in the Premier League, in stark contrast to clubs like Liverpool £124m, Arsenal £120m and Chelsea £113m.

After relegation the club will benefit from a £42m parachute payment, but estimated total TV revenue of £45m will be around £55m lower than PL. On the other hand, most Championship clubs only receive £8m. If not promoted, parachute will drop to £34m, then £15m.

Gate receipts rose by £0.7m (10%) to £7.4m, as they hosted one more Cup game and average attendance was 3% higher, but this was still the 5th lowest match day income in the Premier League, only above Swansea, Burnley, Bournemouth and Huddersfield. Average attendance rose from 23,876 to 24,520 in 2017/18, despite their relegation woes. This was partly due to cutting ticket prices in an attempt to bring the fans back after four consecutive years of decline.

The wage bill surged £13m (17%) from £79m to £92m, even though revenue fell £13m. This was more than double the first season back in the top flight in 2011 (£44m). It included costly loan signings and pay-offs to Pulis and Pardew. The wages to turnover ratio climbed from 57% to 74%, but this is more or less the level it has been for the last few years.

This is the seventh highest (worst) in the Premier League, though in fairness eight clubs have ratios above the recommended 70% upper limit. Even so, the wage bill was one of the lowest in Premier League, around the same as fellow relegated clubs, Stoke £94m and Swansea £91m.

The Baggies made a club record £46m player purchases in 2017/18 (including Burke, Rodriguez, Gibbs, Zhang and Hegazy), meaning £83m in the last two seasons. However, to show the size of West Brom’s challenge in the Premier League, this was only higher than Burnley £44m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/