Skip to main content

West Brom make loss for first time since 2009

The authoritative Swiss Ramble examines West Bromwich Albion's accounts for 2017/18. The club made a loss before tax of £7.4m, compared to a prior year profit of £39.8m, representing a 'significant' £47m deterioration, as revenue fell £13m (10%) to £125m and profit on player sales was down £8m to £6m. After tax, the club went from a £32.3m profit to a £5.8m loss.

This was the first time that WBA have made a loss since way back in 2009, so they have been profitable eight times in the last decade. Between those two losses, the club accumulated £83m of profits, but around half of this came from 2016/17 £40m alone.

However, larger profits have been due to either high player sales (2014 and 2017) or exceptionals (£8m debt waived 2011). In fact, total £64m profit in last 10 years includes £63m from player sales. 2018/19 will include £16m proceeds (Chadli, McClean and Foster).

The £13m revenue fall was very largely driven by broadcasting’s £17m (14%) decrease from £119m to £102m, due to less prize money for finishing bottom. In contrast, commercial rose £2.9m (23%) from £12.4m to £15.3m and gate receipts were up £0.7m (10%) to £7.4m. TV money from Premier League fell £19m from £114m to £95m, as finishing 20th compared to 10th previous season meant a much lower merit payment (£2m instead of £21m).

Nevertheless, a hefty 82% of revenue came from TV (£102m out of £125m), though in fairness it should be noted that no fewer than 12 of the 20 Premier League clubs get more than 75% of their income from this source, with Bournemouth 'leading the way' with an amazing 89%.

The £125m was the lowest revenue in the Premier League, just below Huddersfield Town £125m, Swansea City £127m, Stoke City £127m and Watford £128m. For more context, they were a quarter of a billion below 6th placed Tottenham.

WBA only made £6m profit on player sales, including Jonny Evans to Leicester City, compared to £14m prior year (Berahino to Stoke City and Chester to Villa). This was one of the lowest gains in the Premier League, in stark contrast to clubs like Liverpool £124m, Arsenal £120m and Chelsea £113m.

After relegation the club will benefit from a £42m parachute payment, but estimated total TV revenue of £45m will be around £55m lower than PL. On the other hand, most Championship clubs only receive £8m. If not promoted, parachute will drop to £34m, then £15m.

Gate receipts rose by £0.7m (10%) to £7.4m, as they hosted one more Cup game and average attendance was 3% higher, but this was still the 5th lowest match day income in the Premier League, only above Swansea, Burnley, Bournemouth and Huddersfield. Average attendance rose from 23,876 to 24,520 in 2017/18, despite their relegation woes. This was partly due to cutting ticket prices in an attempt to bring the fans back after four consecutive years of decline.

The wage bill surged £13m (17%) from £79m to £92m, even though revenue fell £13m. This was more than double the first season back in the top flight in 2011 (£44m). It included costly loan signings and pay-offs to Pulis and Pardew. The wages to turnover ratio climbed from 57% to 74%, but this is more or less the level it has been for the last few years.

This is the seventh highest (worst) in the Premier League, though in fairness eight clubs have ratios above the recommended 70% upper limit. Even so, the wage bill was one of the lowest in Premier League, around the same as fellow relegated clubs, Stoke £94m and Swansea £91m.

The Baggies made a club record £46m player purchases in 2017/18 (including Burke, Rodriguez, Gibbs, Zhang and Hegazy), meaning £83m in the last two seasons. However, to show the size of West Brom’s challenge in the Premier League, this was only higher than Burnley £44m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do