Skip to main content

Pulis aggrieved over Derby's finances

With Derby County getting into the Championship play offs and Middlesbrough denied, Tony Pulis thinks that the Rams have got round financial fair play rules. Derby County deny this and the EFL appear to concur: Puli questions rival's finances

I have a great deal of respect for Middlesbrough, not least because former Charlton keeper Darren Randolph is their player of the year. Steve Gibson has been a model owner, continually pouring money in and largely getting disappointment in return. But I have to say that this has the whiff of sour grapes about it. Moreover, many Boro fans see the real problem as being Pulis's playing style.

Another perspective is to look at the contrast between the finances of Boro and relegated Rotherham United: Gulf in finances

However, another person I respect greatly, Kieran Maguire of the PriceofFootball thinks that there has been at least some creative accounting. The article linked to above notes, '[There was] a convenient move that saw Derby chairman Mel Morris sell the club's Pride Park stadium to another company that he owns and then immediately leased it back again.

'That was then deemed as an asset worth around £40m in Derby's accounts and, according to Kieran Maguire, a lecturer in football finance at the University of Liverpool, enabled them to avoid falling foul of the EFL's of 'Profit and Sustainability' rules so badly that the Rams could have faced up to an 11-point deduction. "Someone at Derby has read the small print in the P&S rules,' he said. 'Morris has effectively transferred the stadium from his left hand to his right, reducing the P&S losses in the process."

The one general point I would make is that it shows once again the impact the involvement of business people and big money can have on football. The Championship in many respects has a less level playing field than the Premier League.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/