Skip to main content

'We're in the money'

How does the Swiss Ramble do it? It must be something in the Swiss air that allows him to produce a series of authoritative reports on football finances. After last night, he has updated his figures on the amount that English clubs will earn from the Champions League this season.

Due to the significant increase (around 50%) in Champions League revenue in 2018/19, all English clubs will earn much more than prior season (2017/18 comparatives in brackets). As it stands:

  • Liverpool €107m (€81m)
  • Tottenham Hotspur €102m (€61m)
  • Manchester City €93m (€64m)
  • Manchester United €93m (€40m)

Champions League revenue for Liverpool is €107m for reaching the final, up from €81m last season. Includes: participation €15m, prize money €56m, UEFA coefficient €23m and TV pool €13m. If they win the final, they will earn an additional €4m, bringing their total to €111m.

Spurs Champions League revenue is €102m for reaching the final, up from €61m last season. Includes: participation €15m, prize money €55m, UEFA coefficient €16m and TV pool €16m. If they win the final, they will earn an additional €4m, bringing their total to €106m.

Manchester City Champions League revenue is €93m for reaching the quarter-finals, up from €64m last season. Includes: participation €15m, prize money €33m, UEFA coefficient €24m and TV pool €21m.

Manchester United Champions League revenue is €93m for reaching the quarter-finals, up from €40m last season. Includes: participation €15m, prize money €30m, UEFA coefficient €31m and TV pool €17m. United revenue has been boosted by the UEFA coefficient, a new distribution method for 2018/19, based on performances in UEFA tournaments over the past 10 years. [This is not the same UEFA coefficient that Arsene Wenger liked to parade around Islington.] On this basis, English clubs received the following payments: United €31m, City €24m, Liverpool €23m and Spurs €16m.

It is also worth noting the impact of the TV pool: (a) half based on position in previous season’s Premier League; (b) half based on current season’s Champions League progress. So Manchester City's 1st place in 2017/18 PL explains why they got more than Liverpool and Spurs, even though they progressed further.

The Swiss Ramble concludes, 'However, what is abundantly clear is that the English clubs have really coined it in this season’s Champions League, due to a combination of good progress in the competition and the much higher prize money (plus a good history in Europe in the case of Manchester United).'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/