Skip to main content

Clubs are increasing transfer spend

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has taken a look at transfer spend over the last decade. It is evident that clubs are increasing transfer spend, particularly since the new Premier League TV deal in 2017.

In the last three years (2016-18) the highest gross transfer spend of around half a billion came at Manchester City £559m and Manchester United £487m, followed by Chelsea £416m, Liverpool £351m, Arsenal £288m and Everton £259m. Lowest spend of the Big Six was at Tottenham Hotspur £182m, surprisingly behind Leicester City £195m and Newcastle United £184m.

In the last three years (2016-18) Chelsea recouped most with £274m player sales, followed by four clubs around £200m: Liverpool £225m, Spurs £221m, Southampton £207m and Manchester City £191m. Lagging behind were Manchester United £137m and Arsenal £103m, though Aston Villa did well to earn £102m.

In terms of net spend in last three years (2016-18), City and United again led the way with similar outlays: £368m and £350m respectively. There was a large gap to Arsenal £185m. Tottenham Hotspur and Southampton had net sales.

It is striking how similar net spend is over the last five years (2014-18) at City £525m and United £516m. This is nearly quarter of a billion more than their closest rivals: Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool.

Over 10 years (2009-18) Manchester City is the clear leader in gross transfer spend with £1.4 bn, nearly £400m more than Chelsea £974m, followed by Manchester United £927m and Liverpool £821m. The importance of player sales to Chelsea's business model is again underlined by them leading the way over the last 10 years (2009-18) with £527m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/