Skip to main content

Player trading more important at Bristol City

The authoritative Swiss Ramble blogger reviews the recently published accounts of Bristol City. The club reported a £11m profit before tax, a significant improvement on the prior season’s £25m loss, mainly thanks to profit on player sales surging from hardly anything in 2017/18 to £38m last season.

The £11m profit would have been third highest in the 2017/18 Championship, only behind Norwich City and Derby County £15m (though the latter included £40m stadium sale profit). This is very good, considering most clubs lose money in this ultra-competitive division.

However, this great result was only achieved because of the substantial £38m profit on player sales. Player trading has become increasingly important at Bristol City with £52m profits in the last three years, compared to only £6m in the preceding seven years. Lansdown said: 'Without being mean, players are a commodity. They come and go, they have a value and we need to realise that value.' Profits were boosted by selling Academy players, whose transfer fees are pure profit in the books. As Lansdown said, player trading 'is all part and parcel of the process' of making the club sustainable.

This is the first time that Bristol City have delivered a profit under owner Steve Lansdown, following their highest ever loss of £25m in 2017/18. In fact, the club’s losses added up to £124m in the previous 10 seasons before the 2018/19 turnaround.

Revenue also rose, commercial income increasing £4.6m (39%) to £16.1m, though broadcasting was also up £0.4m (5%) to £8.1m. On the other hand, match day income fell £0.7m (10%) to £6.0m. Match day income fell 10% (£0.7m) to £6.0m, as the FA Cup run to the fifth round did not fully compensate for reaching the Carabao Cup semi-final the previous season.

Revenue has more than doubled since their first season back in the Championship, from £14m in 2016 to £30m in 2019. Most of that growth is commercial, which has nearly tripled from £5.6m to £16.1m. There were also increases in broadcasting £3.4m and match day £2.1m.

Despite the growth, Bristol City £30m revenue is still only 10th highest in the Championship, less than half of some of the clubs benefiting from parachute payments in 2017/18. If parachute payments were to be excluded, it would be a very different story. In this case, Bristol City £30m would be the fourth highest revenue in the Championship, only £11m below the leader (Leeds United, £41m), which would give them a very decent chance of making the play-offs.

Attendances have significantly increased since promotion from League One, rising 80% from 11,681 to 20,949. The redevelopment of the Ashton Gate stadium (capacity 27,000), shared with Bristol rugby club and also used for major concerts, has helped generate revenue. That said, Bristol City average attendance of 20.949 was only the 12th highest in the Championship, around 15,000 less than Leeds United. The club did have a record number of season ticket sales for 2018/19, despite some controversy over the pricing scheme.

The wage bill rose £3.4m (12%) to £30.6m in 2017/18, which means that it has increased by £13.2m (76%) since the first season after promotion from League One in 2016. The wages to turnover ratio slightly improved from 105% to 101%. The £31m wage bill is still firmly in the bottom half of the Championship, a long way below the likes of Aston Villa £73m, Fulham £54m (both with parachute payments) and Wolves £51m (including promotion bonus).

The club had £10m player purchases, including Webster, Weimann, Hunt, Eisa and Watkins. Lower than previous seasons (17/18 £12m, 16/17 £14m), but £36m over last three seasons much more than £8m in preceding three seasons. Still massively outspent by Boro £66m and Fulham £31m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/