Skip to main content

United income flat

Manchester United have reported fiscal first quarter results. Commercial revenue of £80.4m, up 5.9% versus the prior year. Sponsorship revenue was £53.6m, up 8.1%. Broadcasting revenue for the quarter was £32.9m, down 23.1%. Matchday revenue for the quarter was £22.1m, up 35.6%. The operating profit for the quarter was £11m. The fiscal year 2020 is expected to see profits of £560m to £580m.

Income was flat at £135m due to lack of Champions League revenue. The majority of the full year revenue impact of non-participation in the UEFA Champions League will occur in Q2. The failure to qualify for the Champions League has seen a drop in wages which are down 8.8 per cent to £70.2m.

A £12million profit declared on player sales, mainly Romelu Lukaku's £59million move to Inter Milan in August, steered Manchester United to a £2.5 million pre-tax profit in the quarter. Without the benefit of offloading players, Manchester United would have posted a loss for the three months ended 30 September 2019.

Net debt is up £137m to £384m. This was because of cash being used to buy players. Gross debt is unchanged. £158m net cash was spent on players in the quarter.

Manchester United's profit was also weakened during the quarter by a rise in finance costs to £8.5million, on the back of foreign exchange losses linked to the club's sizeable debt pile.

Members of the Glazer family will receive half of their annual £15m dividend in January.

Ed Woodward claimed, 'We have a clear vision in terms of football philosophy and recruitment. The significant investments that we have made in recent years in areas such as transfers, recruitment infrastructure, analytics and our Academy are already beginning to bear fruit.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/