Skip to main content

Should FA Cup replays be cut back even more?

The question of scrapping FA Cup replays (they already in the fifth round) is a highly emotive topic. I do not agree with Jurgen Klopp's decision to absent himself from Liverpool's replay with Shrewsbury Town. I can understand the arguments about the winter break, and it is arguable that the timing of it is wrong. However, Klopp's decision looks rather arrogant and patronising.

There is a lot of talk about the 'magic of the FA Cup', but attendances, particularly in the earlier rounds, suggest that that magic is lost on many fans. Cup competitions are very much secondary ones on the continent which is why the Cup Winners' Cup was scrapped. They are not a real measure of ability as too much rests on chance, although, of course, that is the very element that appeals to fans as do 'giant killings'. However, they are not really 'giant killings' when leading clubs put out reserve teams.

FA Cup success can, of course, have a major impact on the finances of lower league or non-league clubs. In 2006 Burton Albion were a part-time Conference club with a new stadium to fund. Then they drew Manchester United in the FA Cup.

Burton chairman Ben Robinson explained to The Football League Paper that they got a 0-0 draw at home. This was shown live on television which earned them £150,000. The replay at Old Trafford was also shown live, earning them another £150,000. They got 50 per cent of the 53,000 crowd. With sponsorship deals and hospitality, the total was close to £1m. Bank borrowings were wiped out and it provided the platform for promotion to the EFL in 2009.

However, perhaps we are looking at the problem the wrong way round. Whether a club gets a lucrative match is, literally, the luck of the draw. Arguably what is really needed is a more generous and stable transfer of funds to lower league clubs: Time to scrap replays

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl