Skip to main content

Should FA Cup replays be cut back even more?

The question of scrapping FA Cup replays (they already in the fifth round) is a highly emotive topic. I do not agree with Jurgen Klopp's decision to absent himself from Liverpool's replay with Shrewsbury Town. I can understand the arguments about the winter break, and it is arguable that the timing of it is wrong. However, Klopp's decision looks rather arrogant and patronising.

There is a lot of talk about the 'magic of the FA Cup', but attendances, particularly in the earlier rounds, suggest that that magic is lost on many fans. Cup competitions are very much secondary ones on the continent which is why the Cup Winners' Cup was scrapped. They are not a real measure of ability as too much rests on chance, although, of course, that is the very element that appeals to fans as do 'giant killings'. However, they are not really 'giant killings' when leading clubs put out reserve teams.

FA Cup success can, of course, have a major impact on the finances of lower league or non-league clubs. In 2006 Burton Albion were a part-time Conference club with a new stadium to fund. Then they drew Manchester United in the FA Cup.

Burton chairman Ben Robinson explained to The Football League Paper that they got a 0-0 draw at home. This was shown live on television which earned them £150,000. The replay at Old Trafford was also shown live, earning them another £150,000. They got 50 per cent of the 53,000 crowd. With sponsorship deals and hospitality, the total was close to £1m. Bank borrowings were wiped out and it provided the platform for promotion to the EFL in 2009.

However, perhaps we are looking at the problem the wrong way round. Whether a club gets a lucrative match is, literally, the luck of the draw. Arguably what is really needed is a more generous and stable transfer of funds to lower league clubs: Time to scrap replays

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/