Skip to main content

Leagues face Coronavirus dilemmas

Both the EFL and the Premier League are meeting this morning to consider their response to the Coronavirus crisis. Reports are circulating that the EFL may suspend matches for three weeks. In the Premier League, Arsenal and Chelsea will not be able to carry out their forthcoming fixtures.

The expert view appears to be that transmission is relatively unlikely in a large outdoor gathering like a football match, although travel by public transport to the match could be an issue. Gatherings of more than 500 have been banned in Scotland from Monday because of the demands they place on emergency services.

There has been concern that fans could gather outside stadiums where games were being played behind closed doors as happened at Paris Saint-Germain's Champions League game this week. It would be difficult to stop Liverpool fans congregating outside Anfield if their team was winning the title inside the stadium.

La Liga postponed its competition yesterday after Real Madrid players were placed in quarantine. Italy's Serie has been suspended, while games in the Bundesliga and France's Ligue One are being played in front of empty stadiums.

Premier League clubs made £720m in annual match day sales last season according to Deloitte. Most Premier League clubs have insurance policies against loss of ticketing income.

The Premier League has so far been resistant to calls for live free screening of matches that kick off at the traditional time of 3pm on Saturdays. Sky and BT Sport pay more than £1.3bn each year to be live broadcasters with each match costing up to £9m.

Sky could broadcast free to air using its Freeview Pick and Challenge channels. BT could broadcast over its app or on YouTube.

Cancellation of the Premier League season would lead to substantial financial and legal issues about relegation and Champions League qualifications. 14 out of 20 teams would have to vote in favour of any changes to the rule book. One suggestion is that if Uefa postpones the Euro 2020 competition until next year, as seems likely, the Premier League fixtures could be completed in early summer.

How non-league matches would be affected is unclear, but many attract crowds of more than 500 if that is the criterion. Cash flow problems for non-league clubs could be severe.

Some of the many legal issues raised are discussed here by Brabners: Are clubs prepared?

The Premier League, the EFL and the two women's leagues have agreed to suspend all football, including Academy matches, until at least April 3rd: EFL statement

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/