Skip to main content

Swiss analysis of Arsenal accounts gives grounds for concern

Writing from his fastness in Zurich with football matches in Switzerland called off, the Swiss Ramble casts his analytic eye over the recent accounts of Arsenal. He says, 'A £32m loss before tax is obviously not great, though to place this into perspective it is much better than Everton and Chelsea, who both reported deficits above £100m. That said, other clubs have posted good profits in 2018/19, especially Liverpool £42m and Manchester United £27m.'

The low player trading profit (which I discussed in a post last Saturday) combined with a second consecutive season in the Europa League meant that Arsenal recorded its first loss since 2002. This is a huge financial comedown, given that Arsenal have delivered five of the top 20 profits ever registered in the Premier League.

It should be note that player sale income this season will be higher after sales of Iwobi, Bielik, Koscielny, etc. Arsenal have made £170m profit on player sales in the last five years, which is around half of Chelsea £332m. Liverpool and Spurs have made £260m and £161m respectively, though this only covers four years, as 2018/19 accounts are not yet published. [Player sales are becoming an increasingly important but volatile revenue stream for bigger clubs across Europe].

Despite the small growth in the club's revenue to £395m, this is still £28m (7%) lower than £423m reported two years ago. All revenue streams are down since then: broadcasting £16m (8%), due to no Champions League, commercial £6m (5%), match day £4m (4%). The Gunners are the only Big Six club to see revenue fall in the last two years. While they have dropped £30m, others have made huge gains, especially Liverpool, up £169m, and Spurs, up £153m. In fact, the Haringey club are now £65m ahead of their Islington rivals, compared to a £141m shortfall just three years ago.

Arsenal's £395m revenue is now the sixth highest in the Premier League, having been overtaken by Liverpool £533m, Spurs £459m and Chelsea £447m in the last two years. The £230m gap to leaders Manchester United £627m is substantial, but at the same time Arsenal are £200m ahead of 7th placed West Ham £191m.

The club fell two places to 11th in the Deloitte Money League, their lowest position since 2001. Their £4m 2019 revenue growth was one of the smallest – in contrast see Barcelona £129m and PSG £81m. Ivan Gazidis will have noted that Bayer Munich £582m earn around £200m more.

Arsenal earned €34m from Europe for reaching the Europa League final, boosted by the new UEFA TV deal in 2019, though held back by Chelesa winning the trophy (lower TV pool). The Swiss Ramble states, 'My estimates are they will receive around £15m less in 2019/20 after going out in the last 32 to Olympiacos.'

The difference between the European competitions is vividly seen in the new UEFA coefficient payment (based on performances in Europe over 10 years). The highest ranked English team in the Champions League (United) received €31m, while Arsenal only got €3m in the Europa League.

Arsenal have earned an impressive €231m from Europe in the last five years, within striking distance of their North London rivals and Liverpool, though a fair way behind Manchester City €337m. However, there has been a tangible drop-off in the last two years, when the club's revenue was by far the lowest in the Big Six.

The importance of match day revenue to the Gooners is very clear, as shown by 25% of their total revenue coming from this category, well ahead of Real Madrid, Barcelona and Lyon, all 19%. Could be a big hit if Arsenal fail to qualify for Europe [which at present looks likely].

Commercial revenue rose £4m (4%) to £111m, mainly thanks to the new Visit Rwanda sleeve sponsorship. This is sixth highest in England, but miles behind United £275m and City £227m. This is also a fair way below Liverpool, while the Haringey club at £134m have overtaken them. In the last four years Arsenal commercial income has basically been flat (only up £8m), while this important revenue stream has grown significantly at the other leading clubs.

More encouragingly, Arsenal will have improved commercial deals from 2019/20: extension of Emirates sponsorship at £40m (up £10m) and Adidas kit supplier (reported £60m vs. Puma £30m). Worth noting that Emirates includes naming rights and does not allow separate training kit deal.

The wage bill rose £9m (4%) from £223m to £232m (excluding exceptional payments), due to new signings and contract extensions, though no Champions League bonuses. This means wages have risen £32m in the last two years, while revenue has fallen £28m. It should be noted that wage increases at other top clubs have been much greater.

One Arsenal fan commented, 'We need more of this, to finally make the Yanks sell up.' Unfortunately, I don't see this happening any time soon.

Vielen dank, Swiss Ramble, sehr gut.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...
Post a Comment
Read more

Levy's anomalous status at Spurs

It is now nearly a year since Daniel Levy was dismissed as Tottenham Hotspur chairman by the Lewis family.  It has been 12 months of dramatic twists and turns, with Spurs avoiding relegation on the final day of the Premier League season, and then spending unprecedented sums this summer to try to make sure such a scare never happens again. But while most fans focus on the football — and a dubbing by Brentford   — another set of issues have been bubbling away separately. These relate to Levy’s continued position as a minority shareholder in the club. This has been in the news for much of this summer, even as we approach the first anniversary of Levy’s dismissal, and specifically this month, after he missed the opportunity last week to participate in the Lewis family’s latest equity injection into the club. On Thursday morning the club confirmed that his shareholding has been diluted, down by roughly two per cent, after the creation of new ENIC shares. Levy’s dism...
Post a Comment
Read more