Premier League clubs lose £600m

Despite a record annual revenue of £5.156billion and prior to the advent of Covid-19, Premier League clubs achieved record economic losses totalling £599.54m for last season (2018-19), according to financial analysts Vysyble.

With four EFL (English Football League) Championship clubs yet to release their full 2019 accounts, the second senior tier of English football behind the Premier League has so far achieved collective economic losses of £307.47m from revenue of £695.82m. The final economic loss total for all 24 EFL Championship clubs is expected to be at least £350.00m.

The overall result is that the 44 clubs in England’s top two tiers of football will generate almost £6billion in revenue yet are highly likely to produce record economic losses close to £1billion in a single season.

“The latest loss numbers will have already placed the Premier League clubs in a seriously difficult position leading up to subsequent and devastating public health-related events. The Covid-19 virus is not the cause of football’s financial distress. It is merely the accelerant on what our data has very clearly and very correctly identified as a much longer-term problem,” said Roger Bell, a director of Vysyble.

“The 2018-19 numbers are a disturbing and profoundly worrying financial outcome from England’s senior football divisions and is symptomatic of the deeper issues with the overall financial model which we have highlighted many times previously.

“With record losses at club level for 2018-19 and just 36% of Premier League clubs achieving an annual economic profit since 2009, the perception of the Premier League as ‘football’s richest division’ is clearly challenged,” said Bell.

Based on the “economic profit” concept – a much more demanding metric of performance that accounts for all of the costs of doing business including tax and the cost of equity capital – Premier League clubs have generated a collective revenue of £36.10billion since 2009 but have also produced economic losses totalling £2.72billion.

Since 2009, the Premier League club cohort has produced just two collective economic profits from 11 seasons, in 2016-17 (profit of £224.39m) and in 2017-18 (profit of £31.59m). This corresponds to the first and second year of the most recent 3-year 2016-19 Premier League TV contract cycle.

The economic performance change from the 2016-17 profit of £224.39m into a record loss of £599.54m in 2018-19 represents an adverse movement of £823.93m over the course of the Premier League TV cycle which was worth a record £8.236billion. This level of adverse movement is the largest we have recorded for a Premier League TV cycle.

By comparison, the previous 3-year Premier League TV cycle (2013-14 to 2015-16) was worth £5.251billion. The economic performance over the course of this cycle was an adverse movement of £383.37m, from an economic loss of £12.17m in 2013-14 to an economic loss of £395.54m in 2015-16.

“Our data has consistently demonstrated that football has been the master of its own misfortune with an over-reliance on TV revenues, staff cost to revenue ratios regularly in excess of safe operating limits (UEFA guidance recommends 70%) and a failure to recognise key financial dynamics and trends.

“Premier League club owners are still compelled to inject funds into their clubs with the latest balance sheets indicating an additional deployment of £910m in equity capital for 2018-19 despite a revenue record-breaking TV cycle. This has resulted in inevitable economic losses at record levels.

“Unfortunately, our predictions have turned out to be largely correct with the game now facing its most severe financial crisis in generations,” said Bell.

The 5^th edition of Vysyble’s annual report on football finance ‘We’re So Rich It’s Unbelievable! – The Illusion of Wealth Within Football’ is currently in production and will be available free of charge from the end of June 2020 via www.vysyble.com.

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog