Skip to main content

Football's debt kings

The authoritative Swiss Ramble looks at football club debt, noting that it is a complicated subject becaue of different definitions and standards.  

I would add that it is important to note that many businesses run on debt.  For example, I am familiar with the agricultural sector and most farm businesses have an overdraft and various kinds of loans.   The important consideration with debt is whether it can be serviced.

Tottenham Hotspur had the highest gross debt in England as at end of 2018/19 season with £658m (to fund the new stadium), followed by Manchester United £511m (Glazers’ leveraged buy-out), Arsenal £211m (remaining Emirates stadium mortgage) and Liverpool £129m (Anfield main stand expansion).

Because of cash balances four of the Big Six had net debt below £100m: Liverpool £91m, Chelsea £43m and Arsenal £42m, while Manchester City even had net funds of £57m. That left two clubs with hefty net debt: Tottenham Hotspur £534m and Manchester United £204m. Despite all their refinancings Manchester United gross debt has remained around £500m.

Tottenham Hotspur and Manchester United have the highest net debt in Europe, followed by two Italian clubs at just over £400m: Juventus and Inter.

One way of looking at debt is to express it as a multiple of annual revenue. Using the UEFA definition of net debt, most of the Big Six have very low multiples: Chelsea 0.1, Arsenal 0.2 and Liverpool 0.3 (and Manchester City have net funds). The highest multiples are Tottenham Hotspur 1.3 and Manchester United 0.6.

Another interesting ratio is debt to long-term assets, as these assets are often used as security for debt and funded by that debt. Here, a low multiple is good, so advantage Manchester City (net funds), Arsenal 0.1 and Chelsea 0.1. Tottenham Hotspur look a bit better here, due to the value of the new stadium.

While it is important to be able to ultimately pay off debt, the ability to service interest expenses is absolutely crucial, as seen by interest coverage (cash flow/interest paid). The lowest (worst) ratios here are Tottenham Hotspur 6.5 and Arsenal 6.9, but neither are particularly worrying.

If we add dividends to interest, the ratio worsens at Manchester United to 4.4, as they have to make a total of £42m payments every year (£19m interest plus £23m dividends). Regardless of the club’s ability to cover this expense, the club’s fans would prefer this to be spent on the squad.

Of course, the debt situation will have worsened since these figures were published due to COVID, as clubs have had to take out additional loans, e.g. Spurs have borrowed £175m at 0.5% from the government, while Manchester United have drawn down £140m of their revolving credit facility.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...
Post a Comment
Read more