Skip to main content

Football's debt kings

The authoritative Swiss Ramble looks at football club debt, noting that it is a complicated subject becaue of different definitions and standards.  

I would add that it is important to note that many businesses run on debt.  For example, I am familiar with the agricultural sector and most farm businesses have an overdraft and various kinds of loans.   The important consideration with debt is whether it can be serviced.

Tottenham Hotspur had the highest gross debt in England as at end of 2018/19 season with £658m (to fund the new stadium), followed by Manchester United £511m (Glazers’ leveraged buy-out), Arsenal £211m (remaining Emirates stadium mortgage) and Liverpool £129m (Anfield main stand expansion).

Because of cash balances four of the Big Six had net debt below £100m: Liverpool £91m, Chelsea £43m and Arsenal £42m, while Manchester City even had net funds of £57m. That left two clubs with hefty net debt: Tottenham Hotspur £534m and Manchester United £204m. Despite all their refinancings Manchester United gross debt has remained around £500m.

Tottenham Hotspur and Manchester United have the highest net debt in Europe, followed by two Italian clubs at just over £400m: Juventus and Inter.

One way of looking at debt is to express it as a multiple of annual revenue. Using the UEFA definition of net debt, most of the Big Six have very low multiples: Chelsea 0.1, Arsenal 0.2 and Liverpool 0.3 (and Manchester City have net funds). The highest multiples are Tottenham Hotspur 1.3 and Manchester United 0.6.

Another interesting ratio is debt to long-term assets, as these assets are often used as security for debt and funded by that debt. Here, a low multiple is good, so advantage Manchester City (net funds), Arsenal 0.1 and Chelsea 0.1. Tottenham Hotspur look a bit better here, due to the value of the new stadium.

While it is important to be able to ultimately pay off debt, the ability to service interest expenses is absolutely crucial, as seen by interest coverage (cash flow/interest paid). The lowest (worst) ratios here are Tottenham Hotspur 6.5 and Arsenal 6.9, but neither are particularly worrying.

If we add dividends to interest, the ratio worsens at Manchester United to 4.4, as they have to make a total of £42m payments every year (£19m interest plus £23m dividends). Regardless of the club’s ability to cover this expense, the club’s fans would prefer this to be spent on the squad.

Of course, the debt situation will have worsened since these figures were published due to COVID, as clubs have had to take out additional loans, e.g. Spurs have borrowed £175m at 0.5% from the government, while Manchester United have drawn down £140m of their revolving credit facility.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...
Post a Comment
Read more