Skip to main content

Does player trading strategy work for Southampton?

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has cast his eye over the recently published 2019/20 accounts of Southampton FC from his Zurich fastness.   Like many clubs across Europe, Southampton have become increasingly reliant on player trading as a source of funds.   However, Saints have pursued this route more than some other clubs, possibly to the detriment on their performance on the pitch.   Following quotes from the Swiss Ramble's Twitter account.

'Player trading has been a key part of Southampton's strategy. In the five years up to 2018/19 they made a hefty £205m profit from this activity with only Chelsea £332m and Liverpool £306m ahead of them. For more context, Arsenal, Manchester City and Manchester United only made £170m, £147m and £60m respectively.'

Southampton 'explained that their ability to generate profits from player trading was significantly impacted by the summer 2020 transfer window not opening until July, after the financial year ended. Transfer market also depressed by the pandemic reducing clubs’ spending.'

'That said, profit from player sales has declined two years in a row, from £69m in 2018 (mainly Virgin van Dijk to Liverpool) to £21m in 2019, then £14m in 2020. The 2021 accounts will include the sales of Pierre-Emile Höjbjerg to Tottenham Hotspur and Harrison Reed to Fulham.'

Saints 'have now reported losses in the last two seasons, totaling £117m, which has almost entirely wiped out the preceding five consecutive profitable years, which were worth £126m in total, including £42m in 2017 and £35m in 2018.'

'Very few Premier League clubs post operating profits, but Southampton’s loss is (currently) one of the highest this season, though nowhere near as bad as Everton £175m.'

' Revenue has now fallen three years in a row by 31% from the £182m peak in 2017 to £127m in 2020, mainly due to less TV money (absence of Europa League £13m and COVID-impacted Premier League revenue), though match day has also dropped £8m (35%).'

'Due to the impact of the pandemic, the club's £127m revenue looks like it is one of the smallest in the Premier League, though other clubs are likely to be lower after they publish 2019/20 accounts. Either way, miles below the “Big Six”, e.g. Manchester United £509m, Chelsea £407m.'

'Directors remuneration nearly halved from £2m to £1.2m with the highest paid director seeing pay decrease from £728k to £598k. This is relatively low for the Premier League, especially compared to Manchester United £3.1m and Spurs £3m.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl