Skip to main content

Does player trading strategy work for Southampton?

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has cast his eye over the recently published 2019/20 accounts of Southampton FC from his Zurich fastness.   Like many clubs across Europe, Southampton have become increasingly reliant on player trading as a source of funds.   However, Saints have pursued this route more than some other clubs, possibly to the detriment on their performance on the pitch.   Following quotes from the Swiss Ramble's Twitter account.

'Player trading has been a key part of Southampton's strategy. In the five years up to 2018/19 they made a hefty £205m profit from this activity with only Chelsea £332m and Liverpool £306m ahead of them. For more context, Arsenal, Manchester City and Manchester United only made £170m, £147m and £60m respectively.'

Southampton 'explained that their ability to generate profits from player trading was significantly impacted by the summer 2020 transfer window not opening until July, after the financial year ended. Transfer market also depressed by the pandemic reducing clubs’ spending.'

'That said, profit from player sales has declined two years in a row, from £69m in 2018 (mainly Virgin van Dijk to Liverpool) to £21m in 2019, then £14m in 2020. The 2021 accounts will include the sales of Pierre-Emile Höjbjerg to Tottenham Hotspur and Harrison Reed to Fulham.'

Saints 'have now reported losses in the last two seasons, totaling £117m, which has almost entirely wiped out the preceding five consecutive profitable years, which were worth £126m in total, including £42m in 2017 and £35m in 2018.'

'Very few Premier League clubs post operating profits, but Southampton’s loss is (currently) one of the highest this season, though nowhere near as bad as Everton £175m.'

' Revenue has now fallen three years in a row by 31% from the £182m peak in 2017 to £127m in 2020, mainly due to less TV money (absence of Europa League £13m and COVID-impacted Premier League revenue), though match day has also dropped £8m (35%).'

'Due to the impact of the pandemic, the club's £127m revenue looks like it is one of the smallest in the Premier League, though other clubs are likely to be lower after they publish 2019/20 accounts. Either way, miles below the “Big Six”, e.g. Manchester United £509m, Chelsea £407m.'

'Directors remuneration nearly halved from £2m to £1.2m with the highest paid director seeing pay decrease from £728k to £598k. This is relatively low for the Premier League, especially compared to Manchester United £3.1m and Spurs £3m.'

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more