Skip to main content

Brexit affects transfer window as well as pandemic

The effects of the Covid-19 pandemic have been felt in this year’s transfer window, although Brexit has also had an effect.

Clubs in Europe's nine biggest leagues plus the Chinese Super League have this season spent almost €3.5 billion less on players than in 2019/20.  Premier League clubs spent just €300 million less meaning the league's transfer balance deteriorated while others such as LaLiga improved, report offthepitch.com

Europe's nine biggest leagues plus the Chinese Super League this season spent just €4.1 billion on players compared to a figure of €7.6 billion in 2019/20.

That is a 46 per cent decrease - in actual numbers €3.5 billion less – a big difference seen in relation to the way spending has continued to rise for many years.

"It's pretty much due to the financial implications of Covid-19 and the considerable amount of time with little to no fans coming through the door," says Chris Winn, MSc Football Business programme leader at UCFB's Global Institute of Sport.

Among the 'big five' leagues La Liga was the most prudent with clubs spending just €354.7 million, €1.2 billion less than last season.  That figure is even lower than what clubs in Ligue 1 spent, €466.6 million, and that is a league that has been embroiled in crisis since last year's collapse of the Mediapro broadcasting deal. 

Brexit

Football finance guru Kieran Maguire told The Times: 'The Covid crisis is an obvious factor but Brexit is just as important.  The post-Brexit rules mean that the moderate players from the EU that clubs would like to have brought in now do not qualify by the new points system.'

'It probably does not affect the "big six" clubs as they will be looking at players who are internationals for the major countries or who have played in the Champions League, but for the players of a lower tier the stream has very much suddenly dried up.'

Sam Allardyce was unable to sign three players he was interested in for West Bromwich Albion because of the new regulations.  'It's not so much the pandemic, it's the change of rules because of Brexit,' commented the worried supremo.

The upside is more opportunities for domestic players, the downside is that leading clubs may create a bigger gap with the rest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/