Skip to main content

Champions League qualification key for Liverpool finances

The Swiss Ramble has been undertaking his usual forensic analysis of the latest accounts of Liverpool FC.

The club swung from £42m profit before tax to £46m loss, as the impact of COVID-19 resulted in revenue falling £43m (8%) from £533m to £490m, while expenses increased £31m (6%). Profit on player sales fell £18m to £27m, but £4m gain from sale of Melwood. Loss after tax was £39m.

Although the £46m loss is obviously not great, it is actually not too bad compared to others, as all clubs have been adversely impacted by COVID with no fewer than 11 in the Premier League posting losses above £50m to date in 2019/20.

This is the first time Liverpool  have posted a loss since 2016. In fact, even with the chunky loss in 2020, their profits in last six years add up to around £200m. The preceding four years (2011-14) saw total losses of £139m, so the improvement in the club’s financial position is evident.

The main driver of the revenue reduction was broadcasting, which fell £59m (23%) from £261m to £202m, while match day dropped £13m (16%) from £84m to £71m. This was partially offset by commercial rising £29m (16%) from £188m to £217m.

Despite the decrease in 2019/20, revenue has still grown by £188m (62%) in the last four years, largely due to commercial £102m and broadcasting £78m. Thanks to the TV rebate and revenue deferral, commercial is now the largest revenue stream with 44%.

Success on the pitch, both domestically and in the Champions League, has driven significant revenue growth and profitability, but they have been adversely impacted by the pandemic (like all other clubs). Champions League qualification is important to future prospects.

The £490m revenue is the second highest in England, within touching distance of Manchester United £509m, having overtaken Manchester City £478m last season. There is then a fair gap to the following clubs: Chelsea £407m.

£217m is the third highest commercial revenue in England, though still a fair way behind  Manchester United £279m and Manchester City £246m. However, they are now well ahead of Chelsea £170m

Despite the revenue decline, there was sizeable cost growth.  The wage bill rose £16m (5%) from £310m to £326m and other expenses increasing £23m (23%) from £100m to £123m.   There was a  highly incentivized bonus scheme for winning the Premier League, Champions League, etc. Wages have increased by £117m (56%) in the last three years, the highest growth of the Big Six.

The Swiss Rambnle’s rough estimate is that COVID resulted in £60m reduction to revenue, split between £25m lost (match day £11m, TV rebates £14m) and £35m broadcasting deferred to 2020/21. Without this, revenue would have been a club record £550m and the club would have made £10m profit.

Liverpool was also hit by profit on player sales falling £18m from £45m to £27m, mainly Danny Ings to Southampton, Ryan Kent to Rangers and Simon Mignolet to Club Brugge. That’s not bad, but a fair way below Chelsea £143m, Leicester City £63m and Arsenal £60m.

The club have become increasingly reliant on profit from player sales, generating an impressive £333m from this activity since 2015, compared to just £28m in the preceding four-year period.  A core part of the club’s strategy is they have become a club that sells well. In last six years only Chelsea have made more from player trading than the Reds with £475m. However, Liverpool £333m is miles ahead of the rest of the Big Six.

The club earned £70m (€80m) after reaching Champions League last 16. This was £28m less than previous season when they won the competition, but still the second highest of English clubs. In addition, received £4m for 2018/19 final (played after financial year-end), but £2m COVID rebate.

The Champions League has been an important driver of revenue growth with an impressive €272m earned in the last three seasons alone (in last five years only behind Manchester City  in England). On the other hand, as Klopp said, if they fail to qualify, “it would mean a huge financial loss.”

FSG have sold 10% of their company to Red Bird Capital, which should help strengthen the balance sheet, cover COVID losses (estimated at £120m) and fund Anfield expansion. This might facilitate some transfer spending, but is unlikely to go towards a massive “war chest”.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do