Skip to main content

Champions League qualification key for Liverpool finances

The Swiss Ramble has been undertaking his usual forensic analysis of the latest accounts of Liverpool FC.

The club swung from £42m profit before tax to £46m loss, as the impact of COVID-19 resulted in revenue falling £43m (8%) from £533m to £490m, while expenses increased £31m (6%). Profit on player sales fell £18m to £27m, but £4m gain from sale of Melwood. Loss after tax was £39m.

Although the £46m loss is obviously not great, it is actually not too bad compared to others, as all clubs have been adversely impacted by COVID with no fewer than 11 in the Premier League posting losses above £50m to date in 2019/20.

This is the first time Liverpool  have posted a loss since 2016. In fact, even with the chunky loss in 2020, their profits in last six years add up to around £200m. The preceding four years (2011-14) saw total losses of £139m, so the improvement in the club’s financial position is evident.

The main driver of the revenue reduction was broadcasting, which fell £59m (23%) from £261m to £202m, while match day dropped £13m (16%) from £84m to £71m. This was partially offset by commercial rising £29m (16%) from £188m to £217m.

Despite the decrease in 2019/20, revenue has still grown by £188m (62%) in the last four years, largely due to commercial £102m and broadcasting £78m. Thanks to the TV rebate and revenue deferral, commercial is now the largest revenue stream with 44%.

Success on the pitch, both domestically and in the Champions League, has driven significant revenue growth and profitability, but they have been adversely impacted by the pandemic (like all other clubs). Champions League qualification is important to future prospects.

The £490m revenue is the second highest in England, within touching distance of Manchester United £509m, having overtaken Manchester City £478m last season. There is then a fair gap to the following clubs: Chelsea £407m.

£217m is the third highest commercial revenue in England, though still a fair way behind  Manchester United £279m and Manchester City £246m. However, they are now well ahead of Chelsea £170m

Despite the revenue decline, there was sizeable cost growth.  The wage bill rose £16m (5%) from £310m to £326m and other expenses increasing £23m (23%) from £100m to £123m.   There was a  highly incentivized bonus scheme for winning the Premier League, Champions League, etc. Wages have increased by £117m (56%) in the last three years, the highest growth of the Big Six.

The Swiss Rambnle’s rough estimate is that COVID resulted in £60m reduction to revenue, split between £25m lost (match day £11m, TV rebates £14m) and £35m broadcasting deferred to 2020/21. Without this, revenue would have been a club record £550m and the club would have made £10m profit.

Liverpool was also hit by profit on player sales falling £18m from £45m to £27m, mainly Danny Ings to Southampton, Ryan Kent to Rangers and Simon Mignolet to Club Brugge. That’s not bad, but a fair way below Chelsea £143m, Leicester City £63m and Arsenal £60m.

The club have become increasingly reliant on profit from player sales, generating an impressive £333m from this activity since 2015, compared to just £28m in the preceding four-year period.  A core part of the club’s strategy is they have become a club that sells well. In last six years only Chelsea have made more from player trading than the Reds with £475m. However, Liverpool £333m is miles ahead of the rest of the Big Six.

The club earned £70m (€80m) after reaching Champions League last 16. This was £28m less than previous season when they won the competition, but still the second highest of English clubs. In addition, received £4m for 2018/19 final (played after financial year-end), but £2m COVID rebate.

The Champions League has been an important driver of revenue growth with an impressive €272m earned in the last three seasons alone (in last five years only behind Manchester City  in England). On the other hand, as Klopp said, if they fail to qualify, “it would mean a huge financial loss.”

FSG have sold 10% of their company to Red Bird Capital, which should help strengthen the balance sheet, cover COVID losses (estimated at £120m) and fund Anfield expansion. This might facilitate some transfer spending, but is unlikely to go towards a massive “war chest”.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Spurs CEO attacks luxury training base

The Tottenham Hotspur chief executive Vinai Venkatesham has issued a withering assessment of the way the club was run under Daniel Levy, likening the state-of-the-art training centre to a five-star hotel rather than a centre of high performance.  Venkatesham was appointed to his role in April 2025, having stepped down as chief executive at Arsenal the previous summer. However, he has said that some aspects of the club were “in a significantly worse state” than he expected.  “Our training centre is amazing, one of the best, if not the best in the world,” Venkatesham told BBC Sport. “But when you look around, it looks more like a five-star hotel than it does a performance environment. That will change over the summer. I think there are many areas where the club hasn’t got the right level of expertise.”  He explained that the football side of operations was the club’s main downfall when he arrived last year. [One Spurs fan wryly observed that it was like a water company sayi...

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...