Skip to main content

Fury at super league proposal

The proposal for a breakaway European Super League has drawn a storm of protest from Uefa, the Premier League, La Liga, former players, fans and even prime minister Boris Johnson.   Sir Alex Ferguson has condemned the plan in his first public intervention since retiring as Manchester United manager in 2013.

12 clubs have signed up to a plan backed by $6bn in debt financing from JP Morgan which would supersede the Champions League.   It is claimed that another three clubs will sign up this week (thought to be Bayern, PSG and Borussia Dortmund).   Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund have now issued a statement saying they will not join the Super League.

The breakaway clubs include England's top six; Barcelona and Real Madrid; and AC Milan, Inter Milan and Juventus.   PSG and Bayern Munich have not signed up so far: PSG are said to be concerned that the initial novelty of the Super League would wear off after a couple of seasons.   Real Madrid, Manchester United, Liverpool and Arsenal are thought to the biggest drivers of the proposal.

The new league would include 15 teams on a permanent basis with five places awarded on merit, effectively a franchise system.  There is no settled plan for how the five places would be awarded.  It is anticipated that participants would receive a fixed payment of €264m a year.

The tournament, which would start in August, would feature two groups of ten, playing home and away fixtures, with the top three automatically qualifying for the quarter-finals. Those who finish fourth and fifth then compete for the remaining quarter-final places, before a two-legged knockout format is employed for the final eight, ahead of a single fixture final at a neutral venue.

In the past Super League proposals have been forward to extract more money for top clubs from the Champions League.  Uefa's conference today is set to approve a new format for the Champions League which would include more money-spinning ties between top clubs.

However, leading clubs wanted more assurances over a new joint venture that would control all media and sponsorship rights for European club competitions.

Major broadcasters are prepared to enact legal action against clubs who break away or devalue national competitions, as the broadcasters believe the product they’ve invested in would be fundamentally different without the involvement of leading sides.

The clubs have hired InHouse Communications as a British public affairs agency to promote the launch. Katie Perrior, the chair of InHouse, was formerly head of communications for Theresa May during her period as prime minister, while she also worked on Boris Johnson’s 2008 mayoral campaign.

During the 2018-19 season, the live match audience for Champions League football dropped from an average of two billion during the previous three-year cycle to 1.3 billion in the last campaign. In a single year under the current operators, therefore, the Champions League experienced a traditional television audience fall of 35 per cent. The Europa League also experienced a 17 per cent drop.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/