Skip to main content

West Brom loss is smaller than promotion rivals

The Swiss Ramble analyses the 2019/20 accounts of West Bromwich Albion.

The pre-tax loss widened from £7m to £23m, mainly due to promotion bonuses and COVID. Revenue fell £17m (24%) from £71m to £54m, while operating expenses increased £19m (22%), partly offset by profit on player sales rising £19m to £29m. Loss after tax up from £6m to £21m.

The main reason for the £17m revenue reduction was broadcasting, which dropped £12m (23%) from £53m to £41m, mainly due to lower parachute payment, though gate receipts also decreased £2.5m (34%) to £4.8m, while commercial was down £2.4m (22%) to £8.4m.

Despite the fall in broadcasting, this remained the most important revenue stream for the Baggies accounting for 75% of total revenue.  This is followed by commercial 16%, then just 9% from match day.   They will receive much more TV money in the Premier League, e.g. current 19th place would be £102m based on 2018/19 distribution, though they will have to pay £7m rebate as a promoted club in 2020/21total revenue.

The £23m loss is not great, it’s far from unusual in the Championship, even before the pandemic. Three clubs to date have reported larger losses in 2019/20, namely another promoted club Leeds United whose £62m loss was significantly higher.

In fairness, nearly all promoted clubs have had to splash the cash to finance the investment required to get out of the Championship, leading to hefty losses (including promotion bonuses). In fact, the £23m loss is one of the smallest of clubs going up in the last three seasons.

WBA benefited from profit on player sales rising from £10m to £29m, including Salomon Rondon to Dalian Yifang, Jay Rodriguez to Burnley and Craig Dawson to Watford. This is the highest to date in the 2019/20 Championship.   Like many other clubs, the Baggies have become increasingly reliant on player sales with the average annual profit rising to £15m in the last four years.

Up until 2017, the club had not made a loss since 2009, but they have now lost money in the last three  seasons, amounting to £37m. The club had accumulated £83m of profits in the preceding seven years, but around half of this (£40m) came in 2017 alone, under Tony Pulis in the Premier League.

The wage bill rose significantly by £20m (43%) from £47m to £67m, including estimated £17m promotion bonus, an extra month’s wages and loan costs associated with the extended season. Wages down £12m (15%) in three years, while revenue down £84m (61%) in the same period.

The wages to turnover ratio nearly doubled from 66% to 124%, though the Swiss Ramble calculates this would be reduced to 86% if promotion bonus and 13th month excluded. Either way, this is not desirable, but par for the course in this division, where 19 of the 24 clubs are over 100

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Spurs CEO attacks luxury training base

The Tottenham Hotspur chief executive Vinai Venkatesham has issued a withering assessment of the way the club was run under Daniel Levy, likening the state-of-the-art training centre to a five-star hotel rather than a centre of high performance.  Venkatesham was appointed to his role in April 2025, having stepped down as chief executive at Arsenal the previous summer. However, he has said that some aspects of the club were “in a significantly worse state” than he expected.  “Our training centre is amazing, one of the best, if not the best in the world,” Venkatesham told BBC Sport. “But when you look around, it looks more like a five-star hotel than it does a performance environment. That will change over the summer. I think there are many areas where the club hasn’t got the right level of expertise.”  He explained that the football side of operations was the club’s main downfall when he arrived last year. [One Spurs fan wryly observed that it was like a water company sayi...

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...