Skip to main content

Stoke have biggest losses in Championship to date

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has been reviewing the recently published 2019/20 accounts of Stoke City.

The club’s pre-tax loss widened from £15m to £88m, as revenue dropped £21m (29%) from £71m to £50m and profit from player sales fell £15m (83%) from £18m to £3m. Total expenses increased £37m, mainly due to £43m impairment charge (reducing player values). Loss after tax was £86m.

Unsurprisingly, the £88m loss is the highest to date in the 2019/20 Championship, though others have also reported significant losses in 2019/20.   Only three Championship clubs made a profit.

Following four consecutive years of (small) profits between 2014 and 2017, Stok have now posted losses three years in a row, adding up to a hefty £134m in total, though it is worth noting that £74m of this is due to player impairment (non-cash) charge

The main reason for the £21m revenue reduction was broadcasting, which dropped £20m (39%) from £51m to £31m, mainly due to lower parachute payment, though match day also fell £1.6m (25%) from £6.4m to £4.8m. In contrast, commercial rose £0.9m (7%) from £12.9m to £13.8m.   EThe main driver of the increase in commercial income was sponsorship and advertising, up £2.9m, probably due to a higher payment from owner bet365 for shirt sponsorship and stadium naming rights.   Even after the fall, the club’s revenue was one of the highest in the Championship.

If parachute payments were excluded, revenue would fall to £20m (£34m parachute replaced by £4.5m solidarity payment). This would have placed them mid-table in the Championship with the gap to the top club (Leeds  £54m) increasing to £34m.

Revenue has dropped £86m (63%) from £136m in 2017 to £50m in 2020, falling three years in a row. The decline is very largely due to £77m less TV money in the Championship, though commercial and match day are also down £6m (31%) and £2m (33%) respectively.

The club estimated a £38m impact from COVID, split between £4m revenue loss, £4m additional costs (e.g. not utilising the furlough scheme) and £30m of the £43m player impairment. Without this, revenue would have been £54m, but the club would still have posted a £50m loss.

Profit from player sales fell from £18m to just £3m, mainly Erik Pieters to Burnley, whereas prior year included the sales of Shaqiri to Liverpool, Sobhi to Huddersfield Town and Muniesa to Girona. Far below WBA £29m, Bristol City £26m, Brentford £25m and Hull City £23m.

have traditionally made very little from player sales – just £4m a year in the 5 years up to 2015. However, in the last 5 years, profit has increased to £62m, though only £3m of that came in 2019/20 and very few profitable sales have been made in 2020/21 either.

The club have spent £224m to bring in new players in the last five seasons, including £67m in the first season following relegation. Sales proceeds have also increased, but net spend has doubled compared to previous 5-year period. Hardly anything spent in 2020/21.

The wage bill fell £3m (6%) from £56m to £53m, which means wages have been cut £42m (44%) in the two years since relegation (revenue down £77m in the same period). This is the club’s lowest wage bill since £47m in 2011.   Following the decrease, the £53m wage bill was still one of the highest in the Championship.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...