Skip to main content

Stoke have biggest losses in Championship to date

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has been reviewing the recently published 2019/20 accounts of Stoke City.

The club’s pre-tax loss widened from £15m to £88m, as revenue dropped £21m (29%) from £71m to £50m and profit from player sales fell £15m (83%) from £18m to £3m. Total expenses increased £37m, mainly due to £43m impairment charge (reducing player values). Loss after tax was £86m.

Unsurprisingly, the £88m loss is the highest to date in the 2019/20 Championship, though others have also reported significant losses in 2019/20.   Only three Championship clubs made a profit.

Following four consecutive years of (small) profits between 2014 and 2017, Stok have now posted losses three years in a row, adding up to a hefty £134m in total, though it is worth noting that £74m of this is due to player impairment (non-cash) charge

The main reason for the £21m revenue reduction was broadcasting, which dropped £20m (39%) from £51m to £31m, mainly due to lower parachute payment, though match day also fell £1.6m (25%) from £6.4m to £4.8m. In contrast, commercial rose £0.9m (7%) from £12.9m to £13.8m.   EThe main driver of the increase in commercial income was sponsorship and advertising, up £2.9m, probably due to a higher payment from owner bet365 for shirt sponsorship and stadium naming rights.   Even after the fall, the club’s revenue was one of the highest in the Championship.

If parachute payments were excluded, revenue would fall to £20m (£34m parachute replaced by £4.5m solidarity payment). This would have placed them mid-table in the Championship with the gap to the top club (Leeds  £54m) increasing to £34m.

Revenue has dropped £86m (63%) from £136m in 2017 to £50m in 2020, falling three years in a row. The decline is very largely due to £77m less TV money in the Championship, though commercial and match day are also down £6m (31%) and £2m (33%) respectively.

The club estimated a £38m impact from COVID, split between £4m revenue loss, £4m additional costs (e.g. not utilising the furlough scheme) and £30m of the £43m player impairment. Without this, revenue would have been £54m, but the club would still have posted a £50m loss.

Profit from player sales fell from £18m to just £3m, mainly Erik Pieters to Burnley, whereas prior year included the sales of Shaqiri to Liverpool, Sobhi to Huddersfield Town and Muniesa to Girona. Far below WBA £29m, Bristol City £26m, Brentford £25m and Hull City £23m.

have traditionally made very little from player sales – just £4m a year in the 5 years up to 2015. However, in the last 5 years, profit has increased to £62m, though only £3m of that came in 2019/20 and very few profitable sales have been made in 2020/21 either.

The club have spent £224m to bring in new players in the last five seasons, including £67m in the first season following relegation. Sales proceeds have also increased, but net spend has doubled compared to previous 5-year period. Hardly anything spent in 2020/21.

The wage bill fell £3m (6%) from £56m to £53m, which means wages have been cut £42m (44%) in the two years since relegation (revenue down £77m in the same period). This is the club’s lowest wage bill since £47m in 2011.   Following the decrease, the £53m wage bill was still one of the highest in the Championship.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/