Skip to main content

Crystal Palace 'have been run sensibly'

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the (13 month) 2019/20 accounts of Crystal Palace.

The club swung from £5m pre-tax profit to £58m loss, mainly due to profit on player sales dropping from £46m to only £0.5m. Revenue fell £13m (8%) from club record £155m to £142m, partly due to COVID.

The £142m revenue was 11th highest in the top flight, though the gap to the Big Six is enormous, as Palace are more than £200m behind Arsenal £343m. For more perspective, it’s less than a third of Manchester United £509m, Liverpool £490m andManchester City £478m.

Although the £58m loss is obviously not great, it is only mid-table in the Premier League, as all clubs have been adversely impacted by COVID with no fewer than nine of them posting higher losses than the Eagles in 2019/20,

Main driver of the revenue reduction was broadcasting, which fell £11.7m (9%) from £124.4m to £112.7m, while match day dropped £2.8m (19%) from £14.6m to £11.8m. However, commercial rose £1.4m (9%) from £16.4m to £17.8m.    Even after the steep decrease in broadcasting income, this was still by far the most important revenue stream for Palace, accounting for 79% of total revenue, followed by commercial 13% and match day 8%

Without COVID, revenue would have been £11.7m higher at £154m, due to broadcasting rebate and lost match day income. Along with £14.1m extra costs incurred for additional month in accounts less £0.7m net cost savings, this would have resulted in a smaller loss of £33m.

However, the main reason for the worse bottom line was profit on player sales, which declined from £46m to just £539k, as prior year included lucrative Wan-Bissaka transfer to Manchester United. This was 3rd lowest in the Premier League, far below Chelsea £143m.

Since promotion to the Premier League in 2013, Palace have made money in four out of seven seasons, though they have made an overall £52m loss in that period, due to the hefty deficits in 2018 (£36m) and 2020 (£58m).  The Swiss Ramble comments, ‘It is clear that the club have been run sensibly, effectively breaking-even in the top flight before the pandemic hit.’

Despite the decline in 2020, revenue has still grown by £52m (57%) since 2014 from £90m to £142m, their first season following promotion to the Premier League. Much of that growth is due to new Premier League TV deals, but commercial has also shot up.

The reported £133m wage bill was 9th largest in the Premier League, probably higher than most fans would expect.   The wages to turnover ratio increased from 77% to 93%, 4th highest in the Premier League, though this would fall to 86% based on 12-month wages. If we further adjust for the COVID £11.7m revenue loss, the ratio would fall to 79%, though still in top 10.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/