Skip to main content

Financial sting for Hornets could be worse

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the 2019/20 financial results for Watford that covered a season that the club described as “unique and challenging”, as it ended in relegation after they finished 19th in the Premier League and they had three managers: Javi Gracia, Quique Sanchez.

The Hornets swung from £10m pre-tax profit to £36m loss, as revenue decreased £28m (19%) from club record £148m to £120m and profit on player sales fell £4m to £18m, while expenses increased £9m (6%). Prior year boosted by £4.5m Marco Silva compensation.

During their time in the Premier League Watford reported profits in 3 out of 5 seasons, though there is an overall deficit of £49m in this period, due to the hefty losses in 2018 and 2020. In the Championship, they tended to lose money, though the losses were quite small.

One reason for  the club swinging from profit to loss in 2020 is exceptional items. Prior year was boosted by £4.5m compensation for Marco Silva’s move to Everton, while 2020 was adversely impacted by £6.7m termination payments, presumably for Javi Gracia and Quique Sanchez Floresey.

The main driver of revenue reduction was broadcasting, which fell £24m (20%) from £119m to £95m, while match day dropped £2.0m (21%) to £7.3m, commercial decreased £1.2m (6%) to £17.4m and player loans were down £0.9m to £84m.

Even after the steep decrease in broadcasting income, this was still by far the most important revenue stream, accounting for 79% of total revenue followed by commercial 15%.  This revenue stream was again one of the lowest in the Premier League, just behind Southampton. For perspective, this is over a quarter of a billion below Manchester United.

Despite the decline in 2020, revenue has still grown by £26m (27%) from £94m to £120m since 2016, their first season following promotion to the Premier League. However, it will fall again after relegation, despite parachute payments and TV money deferred from 2019/2.

The £36m loss is obviously not great, it is actually pretty good compared to others, as all clubs have been adversely impacted by COVID with no fewer than 13 in the Premier League posting higher losses in 2019/20.

The club listed the COVID impact as £10m lost revenue (broadcasting rebate £7.2m, match day £2.4m and commercial £0.3m), while the Swiss Ramble estimates that £17m TV revenue has been deferred to 2020/21. Excluding £27m reduction, revenue would have been £147m with the club posting a £9m loss.

The £28m revenue decrease is one of the better performances in COVID-impacted 2019/20 Premier League, though in percentage terms their 19%, is towards the upper end. Partly driven by accounting date, as this influences the amount of revenue deferred to 2020/2

Following the decrease in 2020, the  £120m revenue was 17th highest in the Premier League, only ahead of Norwich, Villa and Bornemouth. To place this into perspective, it was less than a quarter of Manchester United’s £509m, highlighting the Hornets’ challenge in the top tier.

The bottom line benefited from £18m profit on player sales, down £4m on prior year, mainly from the sale of Lukebakio to Hertha Berlin, Foulquier to Granada and Oulare to Standard Liège. That’s not bad, but a fair way below Chelsea £143m, Leicester City  £63m and Arsenal £60m.

The club have grown their profits from player trading, making £71m in the last five years, compared to only £19m in the preceding 5-year period. Indeed, 2020/21 figures will include £51m, mainly from Doucouré to Everton, Estupinan to Vilarreal and Suarez to Granada.

Watford spent £66m on player purchases in 2019/20, including Ismaela Sarr, Ignacio Pussetto (from the Pozzo family’s Udinese), Craig Dawson and Joao Pedro. This was in the bottom half of the Premier League, around the same level as Sheffield United.    had £303m gross spend in the transfer market in their 5 years in the Premier League (net spend £195m), significantly higher than the £8m they spent in the preceding 5-year period.

The wage bill rose £12m (15%) from £84m to £96m, a club record, with playing staff increasing from 65 to 74. This means that wages have grown by two-thirds since first season in the Premier League (£58m).   Despite this growth, the £96m wage bill was the 4th lowest in the Premier League. It will fall in the Championship season, due to player departures and relegation clauses (though media reports suggest that some players did not have these).

As a result of the revenue fall, the wages to turnover ratio increased (worsened) from 57% to 80%, the 8th highest in the Premier League. In fairness, without the COVID revenue loss the Swiss Ramble estimates that this ratio would have been only 66%.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...