Skip to main content

Ligue 1's financial worries

The collapse of a television deal has caused serious problems for Ligue 1, emphasising the reliance of football on broadcasting rights.

 The deal would have been worth £670 million annually across Ligue 1. Mediapro, the company looking to make a splash by wrestling packages away from long-term broadcaster Canal+, made one payment of £130 million last August before defaulting on the rest when subscriber numbers dramatically undershot their expectations.

That left black holes on balance sheets across the country, and even though Amazon Prime emerged into the market last month to agree fresh terms, the deficit has only been partially closed. They paid just £215 million a year for the same number of Ligue 1 games as Mediapro had planned (eight per week) — a reduction on the previous deal of more than two-thirds.

The issue is compounded because Canal+ are taking legal action over the sale of those rights. A partner since 1984, they were not given chance by Ligue 1 to submit a fresh bid and are instead stuck paying inflated fees for their package (£283 million per year for two games each week), which was driven up by Mediapro’s original offer. As Canal+ press ahead with suing Ligue 1, the financial horizons appear even more uncertain.

French football has always seen player trading as a significant revenue stream but now, at certain top-flight teams, the pressure is becoming acute, and Premier League clubs are scanning to see if extra value can be gained from acting in this window.

A senior source at a Ligue 1 side says: “French clubs in general are very dependent on player sales to balance the budget. This was the case before the pandemic and before the TV rights’ crisis. Now the situation is more unbalanced.”   I would add that clubs across Europe have become more reliant on the volatile revenue source of player sales.

The financial regulatory body for clubs in France’s top two divisions, the Direction Nationale du Controle de Gestion (DNCG), is taking a hard stance on finances, sending a letter this summer to all teams stating categorically it wants books to be balanced during the summer. Those who do not comply face the prospect of an owner being forced to put a deposit down to guarantee their club can reach the end of the season. “If guarantees are not given, the club will not be allowed to start the league,” a source says. “There is, therefore, a hugely pressing need for most French clubs to sell players this summer.”

The DNCG took dramatic action last week by relegating Angers and Bordeaux, who have been in administration, over financial concerns. Both are appealing the verdict. There are also worries about St Etienne.

  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/