Ajax have a sustainable business model despite Covid hit

The authoritative Swiss Ramble provides a forensic analysis of the latest accounts of Ajax.

Ajax swung from €27m pre-tax profit to €12m loss (€8m loss after tax), a €39m decline, largely due to revenue dropping €37m (23%) from €162m to €125m. Profit on player sales rose €2m to €86m, while operating expenses were up €1m.

The €12m pre-tax loss is the highest in the Netherlands, though it should be emphasised that these accounts are the first published for the 2020/21 season, so the only ones that include a full year of the pandemic. In 2019/20 no fewer than 11 of the 18 clubs were profitable.

The €8m post-tax loss is dwarfed by the massive losses reported by other leading European clubs for the COVID impacted 2020/21 season, including Barcelona €481m, Inter €246m, Juventus €210m.

Ajax have a sustainable business model, so their 2021 loss was only the second they have reported since 2010 (the other loss was less than €1m in 2016). In fact, in the last 10 years they have accumulated nearly a quarter of a billion Euros profit, averaging €24m a season.

They are very reliant on player sales, earning a thumping great €461m from this activity in the last decade, including €361m in last 5 years alone. However, transfer results of this season’s summer window were lower than expected, due to COVID depressing the market. [Clubs across Europe have become increasingly reliant on player sales, but it is a volatile source of income].

They are known for their strategy of developing and selling players, as highlighted by the €275m profit made in the 4 years up to 2020, much higher than PSV €102m, AZ €70m and Heerenveen €41m. In fact, this was more than many leading European clubs.

The €37m revenue fall was mainly due to COVID driven reductions in match day, down €40m (95%) to €2m, partly offset by commercial increasing €4m (5%) to €68m, including €11m NOW pandemic subsidy, Broadcasting fell €1m to €55m, largely from UEFA distributions.

Revenue has fallen by €74m (37%) in the past two years from the €199m peak to €125m, though still club’s third highest ever. Reduction driven by lower UEFA TV money, and especially match day, down to €2m as games played behind closed doors, so just 2% of total revenue.

Clearly COVID has had a significant effect on club finances. The Swiss Ramble estimates the revenue loss in 2020/21 to be around €38m (mainly match day), partially offset by €13m expense savings. Excluding the net €25m impact, the club would have posted a €13m pre-tax profit.

Ajax dropped from 23rd to 27th in the Deloitte Money League, just behind West Ham. This is a good achievement, though their revenue is still far below the European elite. In the last 10 years the gap to top 20 has held steady, but has greatly widened to the leading clubs.

To reinforce the enormous revenue disparity for Dutch clubs, the Eredivisie €530m revenue in 2020 was around 10% of the Premier League €5.1 bn. It was also miles behind Germany €3.2 bn, Spain €3.1 bn, Italy €2.1 bn and France €1.6 bn. Also below Russia €877m & Turkey €670m.

Based on the Swiss Ramble’s estimate, Ajax earned €46m from Europe in 2020/21: €42m from the Champions League group stage plus another €4m after dropping down to the Europa League. It was slightly less than the previous season, due to lower UEFA coefficient and COVID rebate.

They have earned a hefty €194m from European competition in the last five years, which is even more impressive considering that they reach the group stage of the Champions League or Europa League in 2018. The importance of Champions League qualification to the business model cannot be over-stated with their €194m European TV money in last 5 years being considerably more than PSV €72m and Feyenoord €44m.

The €68m commercial revenue is the highest in the Eredivisie, well ahead of Feyenoord €42m and PSV €40m, but it is less than a fifth of the elite European clubs, such as Real Madrid €383m, Bayern Munich €361m and Barcelona €340m.

The wage bill rose €2m (3%) to €95m, as higher performance bonuses offset a reduction in salaries. By some distance the highest in Eredivisie, twice as much as PSV €47m, followed by Feyenoord €38m. There is then a further big gap to AZ €22m, Twente €15m and Vitesse €14m. Following the decrease in revenue, the wages to turnover ratio rose from 57% to 76%

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog