Skip to main content

Arsenal rebuked over cryptocurrencies

A number of clubs have got involved with cryptoassets, seeing a new way of making money, but the Advertising Standards Authority has ruled against Arsenal over adverts on 'fan tokens': https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/dec/22/arsenal-adverts-for-cryptocurrency-fan-tokens-banned

The adverts have been banned for taking advantage of fans' inexperience on cryptocurrencies.   Full ruling here: https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/arsenal-football-club-plc-a21-1121873-arsenal-football-club-plc.html

The ruling could have big implications in a league which is deepening ties with Socios, with Crystal Palace recently becoming the sixth Premier League club to sign up after Arsenal, Aston Villa, Everton, Leeds and Manchester City, despite fierce opposition from fans’ groups.

Earlier this year in a special investigation, The Athletic revealed how alongside “fan engagement” in the form of polls and competitions, the Socios ecosystem is a hotbed of volatile, risky and unregulated financial speculation, with users of the product on social media far more likely to be engaged in talk of “pumping” and “dumping” than anything to do with football.

Fan tokens are cryptocurrency-based digital assets issued by a Malta-based company called Socios, and have taken the footballing world by storm in recent months. Six Premier League clubs have signed bumper sponsorship deals as well as many European big hitters including Barcelona, Inter Milan and Juventus.

So far this sector has gone almost completely unregulated, with seemingly no government bodies keeping tabs on what these products are and the potential risk to consumers — until yesterday’s ruling.

The tokens are based on the “blockchain” technology underpinning cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, are marketed to supporters as giving an opportunity for “fan engagement” by facilitating votes on club matters via the Socios app.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Levy's anomalous status at Spurs

It is now nearly a year since Daniel Levy was dismissed as Tottenham Hotspur chairman by the Lewis family.  It has been 12 months of dramatic twists and turns, with Spurs avoiding relegation on the final day of the Premier League season, and then spending unprecedented sums this summer to try to make sure such a scare never happens again. But while most fans focus on the football — and a dubbing by Brentford   — another set of issues have been bubbling away separately. These relate to Levy’s continued position as a minority shareholder in the club. This has been in the news for much of this summer, even as we approach the first anniversary of Levy’s dismissal, and specifically this month, after he missed the opportunity last week to participate in the Lewis family’s latest equity injection into the club. On Thursday morning the club confirmed that his shareholding has been diluted, down by roughly two per cent, after the creation of new ENIC shares. Levy’s dism...