Skip to main content

The crazy world of top flight finances

As Premier League clubs push back against the idea of an independent regulator, the authoritative Swiss Ramble takes a cold look at their finances from his Zurich fastness.

This analysis looks at how football clubs in the top two divisions have fared in the last 10 years up to 2019/20, the last season when all clubs have published accounts. It therefore excludes 2020/21 when COVID had a big adverse impact as matches were played behind closed doors.

Just looking at revenue, people might think that there are no problems, as the 44 clubs in the Premier League and Championship have generated an impressive £41 bn in the 10 years 2011-20. That said, there is a clear gap between the Big Six, led by Manchester United £4.7 bn, and the rest.

However, a large chunk of this money has simply gone on £28 bn of wages – before clubs pay any other operational expenses, buy players or invest in stadiums, training grounds, etc. Perhaps unsurprisingly, highest wages were paid byManchester City  £2.4 bn, Manchester United £2.3 bn and Chelsea  £2.2 bn.

This approach has resulted in many unsustainable wages to turnover ratios. Over the last 10 years, 32 of the 44 clubs in Premier League and Championship are above UEFA’s recommended 70% upper limit, including 22 higher than 80%. An incredible 12 clubs are above 100%.

As a result, in the last 10 years the top two English leagues have lost a massive £3.1 bn pre-tax with the largest losses at Aston Villa £455m and Manchester City £446m. In this period only 11 out of 44 clubs managed to make money, led by Spurs £338m, Manchester United £191m, Arsenal £112m and Newcastle United  £94m.

These losses would have been even higher without £5.1 bn profit from player sales, led by Chelsea £602m, Liverpool £359m, Arsenal £356m and Tottenham Hotspur £336m. This is a legitimate business model, but these transactions are once-off, so cannot always be relied on to offset operating losses.

Operating losses in the Premier League and Championship in the last 10 years are a staggering £7 bn, with Chelsea “leading the way” with £658m, followed by Aston Villa £582m, Manchester City £580m and Everton  £408m. Only 3 clubs have produced operating profits: Manchester United £461m, Spurs £137m and Burnley £37m.

These losses have essentially been funded by football club owners putting their hands into their pockets with £6.3 bn financing in the last 10 years (loans £4.2 bn, share capital £2.1 bn). Most generous owners are Manchester City £837m, Chelesa £559m, Villa £434m and Everton £348m.

The good news is that relatively little bank debt has been taken out with “only” £693m external financing in the last 10 years. By far the highest is Spurs £746m (new stadium), followed by Liverpool £153m (Anfield expansion). In contrast, repayments made at Manchester United £249m and Arsenal £76m.

In conclusion, there is absolutely nothing wrong with English football – apart from huge losses, unsustainable wages, player purchases on credit and a massive dependency on owner funding. Nothing to see here, please move on, definitely no need for an independent regulator.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do