Skip to main content

The crazy world of top flight finances

As Premier League clubs push back against the idea of an independent regulator, the authoritative Swiss Ramble takes a cold look at their finances from his Zurich fastness.

This analysis looks at how football clubs in the top two divisions have fared in the last 10 years up to 2019/20, the last season when all clubs have published accounts. It therefore excludes 2020/21 when COVID had a big adverse impact as matches were played behind closed doors.

Just looking at revenue, people might think that there are no problems, as the 44 clubs in the Premier League and Championship have generated an impressive £41 bn in the 10 years 2011-20. That said, there is a clear gap between the Big Six, led by Manchester United £4.7 bn, and the rest.

However, a large chunk of this money has simply gone on £28 bn of wages – before clubs pay any other operational expenses, buy players or invest in stadiums, training grounds, etc. Perhaps unsurprisingly, highest wages were paid byManchester City  £2.4 bn, Manchester United £2.3 bn and Chelsea  £2.2 bn.

This approach has resulted in many unsustainable wages to turnover ratios. Over the last 10 years, 32 of the 44 clubs in Premier League and Championship are above UEFA’s recommended 70% upper limit, including 22 higher than 80%. An incredible 12 clubs are above 100%.

As a result, in the last 10 years the top two English leagues have lost a massive £3.1 bn pre-tax with the largest losses at Aston Villa £455m and Manchester City £446m. In this period only 11 out of 44 clubs managed to make money, led by Spurs £338m, Manchester United £191m, Arsenal £112m and Newcastle United  £94m.

These losses would have been even higher without £5.1 bn profit from player sales, led by Chelsea £602m, Liverpool £359m, Arsenal £356m and Tottenham Hotspur £336m. This is a legitimate business model, but these transactions are once-off, so cannot always be relied on to offset operating losses.

Operating losses in the Premier League and Championship in the last 10 years are a staggering £7 bn, with Chelsea “leading the way” with £658m, followed by Aston Villa £582m, Manchester City £580m and Everton  £408m. Only 3 clubs have produced operating profits: Manchester United £461m, Spurs £137m and Burnley £37m.

These losses have essentially been funded by football club owners putting their hands into their pockets with £6.3 bn financing in the last 10 years (loans £4.2 bn, share capital £2.1 bn). Most generous owners are Manchester City £837m, Chelesa £559m, Villa £434m and Everton £348m.

The good news is that relatively little bank debt has been taken out with “only” £693m external financing in the last 10 years. By far the highest is Spurs £746m (new stadium), followed by Liverpool £153m (Anfield expansion). In contrast, repayments made at Manchester United £249m and Arsenal £76m.

In conclusion, there is absolutely nothing wrong with English football – apart from huge losses, unsustainable wages, player purchases on credit and a massive dependency on owner funding. Nothing to see here, please move on, definitely no need for an independent regulator.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/