Skip to main content

Why the Premier League is (trying) to play on

Another Premier League fixture has been postponed today (Everton v. Burnley) making a total of three.  At their Zoom meeting on Monday Premier League clubs considered three options.  Option 1”: play on. “Option 2”: postpone a round of festive fixtures, “Option 3”: halt the season.   The meeting has been widely leaked despite pleas to keep it confidential.

The Athletic understands that Liverpool spoke up most strongly in favour of Option 2 — postponing a round of fixtures. The club’s stance was backed up later in the week by their manager, Jurgen Klopp, and captain, Jordan Henderson, who both spoke out at further meetings on Thursday. Sources say that Arsenal also spoke up in favour of shifting a round of fixtures.

But, ultimately, Option 2 remained a minority position with those arguing against it — the clubs who supported Option 1, playing on — claiming there were too many unknowns involved to support the plan. They also argued that such a plan exposed the clubs to too much risk, and that it wasn’t guaranteed to help mitigate the risk of COVID-19 in the first place.

Clubs from right across the Premier League backed Option 1 to form a strong majority.

A key argument advanced by the larger group of clubs arguing for Option 1 was that postponing fixtures was just to kick the can further down the road — and simply too risky.  In their defence, it is very difficult to see how the Premier League will be able to cram in too many more rescheduled matches into their already congested schedule. This is especially true for top-flight clubs still playing in Europe. 

Playing on naturally means that further outbreaks of COVID-19 in English football are more likely than if everyone was sat at home self-isolating in front of the TV. But a short circuit break — similar to the “Option 2” discussed by Premier League clubs earlier this week — wouldn’t necessarily have helped the issue.

There is an unusual international break from January 24 to February 4, which limits the short-term potential for rearranged fixtures. European nations are not in action during this period but there are rearranged World Cup qualifiers in Asia, South America, Central & North America and Oceania. There is then the final global international break of the season, scheduled either side of the final weekend in March, in which some European nations will complete World Cup qualifying with two rounds of play-offs.

Playing on has its risks — but so would only pausing the season momentarily.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/