Skip to main content

Derby still needs a long-term solution

The original deadline of February 1, imposed by the EFL for Derby’s administrators to source funding until the end of the season, has been extended by a month.  The sense of immediate peril has been eased but concerns persist that the extension to the deadline is just the can being kicked down the road. Derby fans remain no closer to hearing the long-term solution to their club’s uncertain future than they were in the aftermath of the EFL meeting two weeks ago that had promised so much.

Quantuma had initial hopes of announcing a preferred bidder before the new year and having them officially in place before the end of the January transfer window. However, several issues have prevented it from finding a new owner. Since Chris Kirchner’s dramatic exit from the fray, the Binnie family from the US, founders of private investment firm Carlisle Capital, is the only bidder to go public with its interest. It submitted a £28 million bid to buy Derby last Friday, the only offer made public. However, a consortium headed by former Derby chairman Andy Appleby and former Wolves CEO Jez Moxey remains in the mix.

The Derby fanbase is understandably split over the third potential bidder — former Newcastle United owner Mike Ashley, renowned as a master of the insolvency process but equally notorious for draining the soul out of the Tyneside club with little investment in infrastructure and playing staff. But, as is the severity of the situation, most Derby fans would take all comers willing to stump up the cash.

The Athletic understand that Quantuma has saved enough money through player sales, including the recent departures of Dylan Williams and Graeme Shinnie for fees, and cost-cutting methods to sustain the club until February.

Quantuma’s confidence that Derby will exit administration intact derives from noting a provision in the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 that appears to enable them to write off a significant chunk of their debts, including £29 million to HMRC. Quantuma’s plan to offer the taxman the same 25 per cent of what is owed to the unsecured creditors makes Derby a much more attractive option for buyers and explains why the Binnie family has bid only £28 million.

However, the law has changed since the last football administration, and the EFL is yet to update its rule book, so the method is not yet approved. The latest update is that the EFL has offered to send the matter to arbitration.

In its statement confirming the month-long extension, Quantuma said: “The additional month will provide time to seek clarity on the claims from Middlesbrough and Wycombe.” These remain significant stumbling blocks, cited by administrators last week as a “key issue for interested parties”. Carlisle Capital made its bid in full knowledge of the claims, suggesting it will not prevent a bidder from making progress. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/