Since 2012 the Champions League has been sponsored by Gazprom, the Russian state energy giant. Between 2018 and 2021 this was worth €40mn a year to Uefa.
The relationship, which was renewed until 2024, is nothing
new. But it took the Russian invasion of Ukraine to provoke any real backlash
against the Gazprom logo on the advertising boards, hospitality suites and
television screens.
Gazprom also owns football team Zenit St Petersburg and was until this week a mainstay
on the shirts of FC Schalke 04,
which plays in the energy company’s key German market.
Football had been “sleepwalking into this situation for the
best part of 15 years”, Simon
Chadwick, professor of Eurasian sport at Emlyon Business School in Paris, told the Financial Times.
As he has pointed out, Gazprom isn’t exactly in the business
of selling gas to fans during the half-time interval. His interpretation? Sponsorships
in high-profile sports come with soft power and fast-tracked diplomatic
meetings.
Yet much of the scrutiny of Uefa’s partnership with the
energy company has focused on the location of this season’s Champions League
final, which the governing body has moved from the Gazprom Arena in
St Petersburg to Paris after mounting political pressure.
Uefa is now seeking to end the sponsorship deal.
Gazprom declined to comment to the Pink 'Un.
In this crisis, one thing has been clear: political leaders
are kingmakers in these events, with Uefa thanking French president Emmanuel Macron for “his
personal support and commitment” in having the match moved from Russia to the
French capital.
Arguably, Russia has already had its return, while Uefa has
pocketed the cash.
Comments
Post a Comment