Skip to main content

Leicester's finances relatively good for top flight

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews Leicester City’s 2020/21 accounts, when they reduced their pre-tax loss from £67m to £33m, as revenue rose £76m from £150m to £226m, though wages were also up £35m from £157m to £192m.

Although the £33m loss is obviously not great, it’s actually one of the better financial results of the clubs that have reported so far in 2020/21, certainly compared to huge deficits at Chelsea £156m and Tottenham Hotspur £80m, as football counted the cost of the pandemic.

The Foxes have now reported three consecutive years of losses, adding up to £121m, which is in stark contrast to the 4 years of profits after promotion to the Premier League in 2014. That included the amazing £92m surplus in 2017, which is actually the 3rd highest profit in PL history.

Revenue increase helped by on-pitch success, but also recognition of revenue from delayed 2019/20 season. Broadcasting rose £77m (71%) from £108m to £185m, while commercial grew £12m (41%) from £29m to £41m. These offset £13m (96%) reduction in match day to just £552k.  Following the growth, the £226m revenue is 7th highest in England, though still a long way below the Big Six, e.g. less than half of Manchester City £570m & Manchester United £494m.

The figures benefited from £44m profit on player sales, almost entirely due to Ben Chilwell’s big money move to Chelsea, though this was down from prior year £63m. Second highest in 2020/21 Premier League to date.   The club made very little from player sales up to 2016, but profits have surged since then. Indeed, have the 5th highest profits in the Premier League in the four years up to 2020. However, this year’s gain will be much lower with the highest sale only being Ghezzal to Besiktas £3m.

Leicester earned £14m for reaching the Europa League last 32 (€17m per my model), though this was significantly lower than the Champions League representatives, e.g. Chelsea and Manchester City received €120m for reaching the final (around seven times as much as Leicester).   Thanks to their solitary, albeit very lucrative, season in the Champions League exploits in 2017, Leucester have earned just under €100m from Europe in the last five years, the 7th highest in England, though a lot less than Manchester City €422m.

They have announced plans to expand the King Power stadium, increasing the capacity to around 40,000 by adding 8,000 seats to the East Stand. The clubs said this was “a key part of the club’s long-term strategy for growth” with completion targeted for summer 2024.

The wage bill rose £35m (22%) from £157m to £192m, partly due to further investment in the playing squad, including contract extensions, but mostly because 20% of player & management bonuses was deferred from 2019/20. Wages were up from only £57m in first season in Premier League.  Following the growth, the £192m wage bill is 7th highest in the Premier League, just behind Spurs £205m. That said, it’s around £150m below the highest-spending clubs to date in 2020/21, namely Manchester City £355m and Chelsea £333m.

As a result of the revenue increase, the wages to turnover ratio decreased (improved) from 105% to 85%, though this is still the worst in Premier League to date in 2020/21 with the next highest being Chelsea 77%. Others are likely to be worse when they publish COVID impacted accounts.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/