Skip to main content

QPR post smallest loss since 2006

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the latest accounts of QPR.   Thrpre-tax loss narrowed from £16.4m to £4.5m, despite revenue falling £3.8m (21%) from £18.3m to £14.5m, as profit on player sales rose £11.7m to £17.6m and there was no repeat of prior year’s £4.5m write-off of previous training ground development.

The £4.5m loss is actually one of the better results in the Championship. Even before the full effects of the pandemic were felt in 2020/21, many clubs lost more than £20m, while Bristol City and Millwall lost £38m and £14m respectively last season.

Although QPR continue to lose money, their turnaround is emphasised by the 2020/21 £4.5m loss being the lowest since 2006. However, since Tony Fernandes arrived in August 2011, total losses have been £230m – or £290m if we exclude the £60m loan write-off in 2014.

The £3.8m revenue reduction was entirely due to the COVID driven £3.8m fall in match day income from £4.0m to just £207k. Broadcasting rose £0.1m (2%) to £8.6m, including iFollow streaming income, while commercial was flat at £5.8m.  £15m revenue is now firmly in the bottom half of the Championship, highlighting the club’s ability to punch above its weight, as this is only around a quarter of clubs benefiting from parachute payments

The club have not quantified the effect of COVID, but the Swiss Rambles estimates they lost around £3m revenue in 2020/21, mainly £4m gate receipts, as games played without fans. Partly offset by £1.3m iFollow streaming and £0.5m furlough payments.   They would have been close to break-even without the pandemic.

Financials boosted by £17.6m profit on player sales, £11.6m higher than prior year £6.0m, almost compensating for operating loss.   This was very largely driven by sale of Eberechi Eze to Crystal Palace.  QPR have not traditionally made much money from player sales, but this has been on an upward trend with £26m profit in the last three years. That said, very little has been generated from player trading in 2021/22.

The Super Hoops no longer benefit from parachute payments, having received £90m in the 4 years up to 2019. These are so significant that they make it difficult for others to compete, e.g. in 2019/20 a relegated club received £42m in year one, £34m in year two and £15m in year three.

Average attendance (for games played with fans) was 13,721 in 2019/20, which was down 4,100 since relegation and is one of the lowest in the Championship. However, the club noted that attendance to date this season has seen “a marked improvement”.

The club have been looking for a new ground for some time, as the club “is not financially sustainable in the long-term” at the Kyan Prince Foundation Stadium). The Linford Christie Stadium in Wormwood Scrubs is the preferred choice, but they may have to look further afield.

The wage bill rose £4m (21%) from £20m to £24m, as the number of players, managers & coaches increased from 99 to 113, though wages have still fallen by a staggering £51m (68%) compared to £75m under Harry Redknapp in the 2014 Championship.

Despite the 2020/21 growth, QPR £24m wage bill is still comfortably in the bottom half of the Championship, ahead of Millwall £21m. Far below Norwich City £67m and Brentford £41m in 2020/21, though both of those clubs included hefty promotion bonuses.

The wages to turnover ratio increased from 109% to 166%, which is clearly not sustainable, though was severely impacted by the COVID revenue decrease in 2020/21. Even before the pandemic, most clubs in the ultra-competitive Championship had ratios well above 100%.

The club have spent £25m on new players in the last 5 years, though 2019 included a transfer embargo as part of the FFP settlement. This is a huge reduction from the £124m they splashed out on transfers in the preceding 5-year period.  There has been less than £3m expenditure since year-end.

The gross debt rose £9m from £53m to £62m, including £55m from the owners (£46m loan plus £9m convertible bond issued to Ruben Gnanalingham’s wife) and £7m EFL loan. It would have been much higher without capitalising £232m loans (£17m last year) and writing-off another £60m.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/