Skip to main content

Are two bids leading Chelsea race?

The £3bn sale of Chelsea football club moved one step closer this week, with two investment groups backed by US billionaires leading the pack in a hotly contested auction being handled by merchant bankers at Raine Group according to the Financial Times.   Other accounts, for example in The Times, argue that there are still four in the race.

According to the Thunderer there is a bid in contention from Stephen Pagiluca, an America private equity executive who is joint owner of the Boston Celtics basketball team and the 55 per cent owner of Atalanta in Serie A.   The private investment firm he co-chairs has assets of £118m.

As seen by the Pink ‘Un, Todd Boehly, the financier and co-owner of baseball’s Los Angeles Dodgers, is up against private equity tycoons Josh Harris and David Blitzer in the bidding for one of sport’s highest-profile assets, although there’s still an outside chance of a dark horse winner.

US billionaires have turned to members of the British establishment to put the shine on their bids, with Boehly winning the support of Times of columnist Lord Daniel Finkelstein, and the rival bid going for City grandee Martin Broughton and Sebastian CoeWorld Athletics president.

It’s just one hint that this is a contest that won’t be settled on price alone, and the stakes are high in a complex situation that has required the UK government to exempt Chelsea from the full force of sanctions to avoid its collapse, hence antagonising its large fan base.

According to people with knowledge of the matter, the onus is on bidders to show how much of the cash will go to charitable causes, most likely in Ukraine, and to set out how much they can afford to invest in the club and its Stamford Bridge stadium, which is crying out for expansion and modernisation.

The importance of equity as opposed to debt-heavy offers was vital in the first round of bids, with an offer from Saudi Media Group ruled out because of its reliance on the latter form of financing.

The watchful eye of Chelsea’s supporters is also a key factor in the process, particularly with Raine and Abramovich reliant on obtaining special approval from the UK government to complete any transaction. 

That weakened a rival bid from the Ricketts family, owner of the Chicago Cubs baseball team. Chelsea fans have campaigned against the bid because of an Islamophobia scandal involving the family’s patriarch. The Ricketts stressed that “racism and Islamophobia have no place whatsoever in our society”.

Having decided that Abramovich can no longer own Chelsea, the UK government will be keen to avoid controversy over the identity of the next owner, piling the pressure on Raine and the American billionaires competing to own what is seen as one of football’s trophy assets, particularly by Americans.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/