Skip to main content

Big losses at Boro

Middlesbrough had reported losses of over £30m with the club battered by the pandemic: https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/middlesbrough-fc-reveal-30m-losses-23433844

Steve Gibson has been an exceptionally generous owner and hasn't got that much in return, but perhaps this season will bring cup and league success.

COVID meant hardly any gate receipts in the year. Broadcast income was due to IFollow. Commercial income was down over 40%.  Boro had the foresight to take out business interruption insurance which paid out £2.75m. Furlough claims were £589k.

Wage bill up by 13%. Wages were £186 for every £100 of income, way above the 70 per cent recommended by Uefa. Average weekly wage was £12,500.

Middlesbrough owe over £120m to Steve Gibson’s holding company, as well as £7m in transfer fees and £17m in unpaid tax, despite borrowing nearly £8m from the EFL in the year.   In any other sector of the economy, this would be seen as a business in dire trouble.

Since the year end Boro have bought players for a net £7.8m. The club has deferred some tax payments which have now recommenced.

Middlesbrough total losses are almost £233 million.  The club has large liabilities, mainly due to the parent company and taxes. Sadly the club uses a company law exemption to avoid publishing a cash flow statement, notes Kieran Maguire of the PriceofFootball.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/