Skip to main content

Huddersfield losses low by Championship standards

Kieran Maguire of the PriceofFootball summarises the 2020/21 accounts of Huddersfield Town.

Revenue £45m down 23%; wages £25m 19%; operating loss £5m.  Player purchases £2m and player sales £21m Borrowings £44m.

Huddersfield bought players for £2m and sold players (who originally cost £71m!) for £21m.  The club borrowed £15m in 2020/21 but paid back loans of £27m to end up with overall borrowings of £44m.

Total income was down partly due to second season of parachute payments which are lower by about £7m.  Broadcast income 90% of total for Huddersfield.   This is likely to fall to about £16m in 2021/22.  Commercial income (including loan fees) down 70% mainly because loans were over £5.6m in 2019/20 and only £0.6m in 2020/2.  Matchday income (which may include iFollow) was down by more than half due to lockdown.

Biggest cost for clubs is player based. Wages down and £55 for every £100 of income, a good ratop. Average wage was £11k a week, lower than the Championship average.

Operating losses excluding one off transactions and player sales decreased. Still over £100k a week, but this is low by Championship standards.

There is a very useful detailed analysis here (better than what you usually get from local sources): https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/football/news/huddersfield-town-profit-financial-accounts-23562373

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/