Skip to main content

Staveley sorry to see Roman go

The Financial Times Football and Business summit this week was certainly timely.

Roman Abramovich’s purchase of Chelsea back in 2003 changed the face of English football, kick-starting an era in which billionaires and institutional investors buy clubs for status and trophies.

So his decision to sell the team marks the end of an era.   However, those who are hoping for a return to the era of owners like Burnley’s Bob Lord may be disappointed.

The move was widely interpreted as an attempt to head off potential sanctions. Politicians, including Labour leader Keir Starmer, continue to call on the UK government to include Abramovich on its list of Russian targets.

Richard Masters, Premier League chief executive, said the fastest the league has ever approved a takeover is 10 days and there have been suggestions that a possible Swiss-American joint bid could be fast tracked. But he added any approval was unlikely if Abramovich was subject to sanctions.  The Government may be prepared to delay them because they do not want to alienate Chelsea fans, but MPs like Labour’s Chris Bryant are seeking the high moral ground.

Abramovich’s departure could trigger governance changes. Masters said the League is considering changes to its owners and directors test, which determines whether buyers of clubs are suitable.

But Amanda Staveley, the British financier who convinced the Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to lead a takeover of Newcastle United last year, told the Pink 'Un she was “sad someone [Abramovich] is going to have a football club taken away because of a link they may have with someone [Vladimir Putin]” .

Staveley, who is a shareholder in Newcastle, is another investor with ties to a controversial political figure. Mohammed bin Salman, the Saudi crown prince and chair of PIF, has been forced to deny western intelligence reports that he approved the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018.

“But,” she noted, “we do have to hold all of our relationships to account.”

I am not a Chelsea fan, but I must say that I find the spectacle of some football fans wishing them harm unedifying.   Admittedly, they have had one of the biggest injection of outside funds of any club (around £1.7bn), but that is not so unusual these days.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Levy's anomalous status at Spurs

It is now nearly a year since Daniel Levy was dismissed as Tottenham Hotspur chairman by the Lewis family.  It has been 12 months of dramatic twists and turns, with Spurs avoiding relegation on the final day of the Premier League season, and then spending unprecedented sums this summer to try to make sure such a scare never happens again. But while most fans focus on the football — and a dubbing by Brentford   — another set of issues have been bubbling away separately. These relate to Levy’s continued position as a minority shareholder in the club. This has been in the news for much of this summer, even as we approach the first anniversary of Levy’s dismissal, and specifically this month, after he missed the opportunity last week to participate in the Lewis family’s latest equity injection into the club. On Thursday morning the club confirmed that his shareholding has been diluted, down by roughly two per cent, after the creation of new ENIC shares. Levy’s dism...