Skip to main content

Cardiff City rack up losses

The tireless and authoritative Swiss Ramble examines Cardiff City’s 2020/21 financial results, when they reduced their loss from £12m to £11m. Revenue rose £9m to £55m, as TV i the club’s owners.

Losses

In the 11 years since Vincent Tan bought the club in May 2010, they have accumulated £154m of losses, £81m in the last five years. In that period the club has only had two (small) profits, £4m in 2015 and £3m in 2019. They even contrived to lose £12m in the Premier League in 2014.

Furthermore, the 2015 £4m profit was entirely due to once-off factors (£13m debt-write-off and £13m interest adjustment). If the club is correct that they will not need to pay a transfer fee for Sala, then future financials will be boosted by reversal of £20m provision.

The £11m loss is clearly not great, it was nowhere near as much as some others in 2020/21 Championship, e.g. Bristol City £38m, Reading £36m and Boro £31m. Highest profits from two clubs relegated from the Premier League the prior season: Norwich City £21m and Bournemouth £17m.

The pre-tax loss narrowed from £12m to £11m, as revenue rose £9m (20%) from £46m to £55m and operating expenses were cut £3m (4%), though profit on player sales fell £11m from £14m to £3m.

The operating loss (excluding player sales and interest) halved from £24m to £12m, one of the best results in the Championship, where almost every club has big operating losses, i.e. nearly half of them are above £30m.   The club generated a £22m profit in the Premier League in 2019.

Revenue

The £55m revenue is £70m (56%) down from the pre-pandemic £125m peak in the Premier League two years ago. 2020/21 was boosted by £8.8m deferred revenue from extended 2019/20 season. If that is excluded, revenue would have dropped from £55m to £46m.

The £55m revenue was 4th highest in the Championship, only surpassed by the three clubs most recently relegated from the Premier League, who all received higher parachute payments: Bournemouth £72m, Norwich City £57m and Watford £57m.

City received around £74m in parachute payments in the last two years, but they have lost this advantage this season. They only got two years of payments instead of the usual three, as they were relegated after just one season in the Premier League.

Broadcasting income rose £11m (31%) from £37m to £48m, as money deferred for games played after 2020 accounts offset lower parachute payments. Match day fell £2.5m (68%) from £3.7m to £1.2m, as games played without fans. Commercial slightly increased to £5.6m.

Chairman Mehmet Dalman said, “The pandemic hit us hard”. Impact not quantified, but the Swiss Ramble estimates at least £3m lost revenue in 2021 (mainly match day), giving £7m in past 2 years. However, 2021 boosted by £8.8m deferred TV revenue for games played after 2020 accounts.

Player sales and purchases

Profit on player sales fell £11m from £14m to £3m, including Neil Etheridge to Birmingham City and Callum Paterson to Sheffield Wednesday. Significantly lower than the three clubs relegated from the Premier League, who each generated between £56m and £60m.

The Bluebirds have made very little money from player sales, only £34m in total in the last decade, most of which came in just two years (£10m in 2015 and £14m in 2020). This season will include the sales of Kieffer Moore to Cherries and Robert Glatzel to Hamburg.

The club only spent £5m on players in 2020/21, including Kieffer Moore. This was less than a third of the previous season’s £19m and well down from £38m outlay in 2019 Premier League. Three Championship clubs spent more than £20m (Brentford, Norwich City and Watford).

Interestingly, the £82m gross transfer spend in last five years is less than £88m outlay in the preceding five-year period. Highest expenditure was in the two Premier League seasons. Before January window, Dalman said, “There’s still no money – we’ll do the best we can.”

Average attendance in 2019/20 (for games played with fans) was 22,746, which was 7th highest in the Championship. However, this was 8,663 (28%) lower than the 41,409 they achieved in the Premier League, which the club said was “a direct result of relegation”.

Wages

Wages fell £2.1m (6%) from £35.6m to £33.5m, as player salaries were down from £27.9m to £26.0m. Likely to further fall in 2021/22,as some players come to the end of their contracts. It is worth noting that Cardiff only paid £54m when competing in the top flight.  After the decrease, the £33m wage bill was around mid-table in the Championship, less than half of Watford £68m and Norwich £67m (though their figures did include hefty promotion bonuses).

The wages to turnover ratio decreased from 77% to 61%, which was second lowest (best) in the Championship, where most clubs have unsustainable ratios above 100% (with no fewer than 5 higher than 200% in 2020/21). Cardiff had an incredibly low 43% in the Premier League.

Debt

The gross debt rose £1m to £94m, mainly from owner Vincent Tan £61m (up £15m), Tomen Finance £15.8m (where Dalman has a significant influence), Tan’s son £3m and Dalman £2m.  There were also £12m other loans, including £6.2m from the EFL.

The £94m debt is 9th highest in the Championship, though far below the likes of Stoke City £212m, Bournemouth £165m and Blackburn Rovers £152m. However, Cardiff’s debt would be much higher without Tan converting £93m into capital and writing-off £23m in the last decade.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/