Skip to main content

Chelsea bids introduce us to the American sports syndicate

Epitaphs have been written for globalisation in the wake of the war in Ukraine, but it is still a force in football, even if there are no longer Russian and Chinese bidders.

If the Chelsea takeover story has told us anything it is that British football’s move to more contemporary North American ownership structures, backed by North American money, is the way things are going.

The three finalists in the auction for Chelsea are all partnerships of plutocrats, as was the Chicago-based bid led by the Ricketts family and billionaire investor Ken Griffin that pulled out of the race before last week’s deadline for final bids. Each of these bids includes advisors and potential directors from the UK but the vast majority of the partners, and almost all of the money, is from the US and Canada.

Not as British as it looks

The bid led by former British Airways and British American Tobacco boss Sir Martin Broughton.  It may appear to be wrapped in the union jack. British business royalty, Broughton is also a huge Chelsea fan and has experience of running a major football club during a difficult transition, as he helped Liverpool move from the troubled ownership of two Americans, Tom Hicks and George Gillett, to the calmer waters of Fenway Sports Group (FSG).

Broughton is the figurehead of the bid — a very good figurehead — but most of the money is coming from American billionaires. Chief among those are David Blitzer and Josh Harris, who already own minority stakes in Crystal Palace, among other sports investments, but presumably want to move up market, and Alejandro Santo Domingo, a Colombian-American financier who owns a significant stake in the world’s largest brewer, AB InBev, and is married to an heir of the Duke of Wellington.

A big cheque

All three of these bids are strong and none should have much difficulty in hitting a number somewhere north of £2.5 billion, which The Athletic has already reported would be the biggest cheque ever written for a sports team. Who wins, however, will depend on which of them convinces the British government, the Raine Group (the American bank running the auction) and current owner Roman Abramovich (the elephant in the room) that they will be the least controversial and most popular new custodian at Stamford Bridge (and can fund a much needed redevelopment of the stadium).

The sports syndicate

The concept of the ownership syndicate has crept up on us.    If done correctly, they can bring together a diversified group of individuals, with various backgrounds that can add experience and expertise.  

These structures have been commonplace in private investments in the US since the 1970s, which means they have been commonplace in US sports ownership, too. It is how most sports deals are done now in the US — the sums involved are just so big, syndicates are an inevitable by-product.   They can look more user friendly if they have the names of prominent sports stars such as Serena Williams and Sir Lewis Hamilton added to them in return for relatively small stakes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/