Skip to main content

New threats to Chelsea sale

A series of further complications have arisen in the sale of Chelsea: the late intervention by Sir Jim Ratcliffe; doubts about the Abramovich loan; and the retention of existing key figures associated with Abramovich in club management.  The special licence from the Government expires on May 31st and a failure to secure a deal by then could complicate transfers for next season.

Sir Jim Ratcliffe has undertaken a PR initiative by giving an interview to BBC TV from Madrid (wonder why he was there?}  He insists that he has had 'productive' discussions with government (Nadine Dorries?) on his late bid.

He once again points out that his is the only 'British' bid which is one way of characterising residence in the tax exile haven of Monaco.  He said his bid was late because one had to think carefully about acquiring a 'national asset' like Chelsea.  Asked why he did not try to buy the club he had originally supported, Manchester United, he said it was not for sale.

Roman Abramovich said that the £1.5bn debt owed to him by the club's parent company could be waived and the proceeds of the sale given to victims of the war in Ukraine.  However, forgiving the debt would create a hefty tax bill for the club.   There are difficulties about how the money could be repaid while remaining frozen and then paid to charity.

Investment bank Raine has apparently signalled to bidders that Chelsea chair Bruce Buck and director Maria Granovskaia (a Russian-Canadian) should be offered an option to stay on, although it has denied signalling or telling bidders that keeping the pair would strengthen their bid.   According to the Financial Times, the leading Boehly consortium has agreed to their retention, and it is believed that the other two bidders have done so as well, although they declined to comment.

This news has caused some alarm in political circles.  Julian Knight, chair of the Commons committee that covers sport, told the Pink 'Un: 'Any continuity with the Abramovich regime at Chelsea is certainly an unsettling development.'

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow
Post a Comment
Read more

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is
Post a Comment
Read more

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/
Post a Comment
Read more