Skip to main content

The growth of multi-club ownership

Multi club ownership (MCO) notionally offers a broad array of benefits: cost-savings, knowledge sharing, player development. To its opponents MCO is an assault on club heritage and traditions, poses huge questions about sporting heritage and even makes clubs “slaves” to bigger interests.

Research carried out by Play The Game last October found that 156 clubs from around the world are part of 60 MCO groups.

This has increased in the past 8 months. For example, 777 Partners – one of the most prominent MCO groups – have added Standard Liege and Vasco da Gama to its portfolio already this year, and have just this week bought a French club – of which more later.

Play The Game argued last Autumn that “the phenomenon raises new questions of governance for everyone from international football federations to clubs, players, and fans.” Its report came shortly after the Italian federation, the FIGC, clamped down on MCOs. This followed Salernitana’s promotion to Serie A last summer. The Salerno club was owned by Claudio Lotito, who also owns Lazio.

Lotito was forced to place his ownership of in a trust and ultimately to sell his stake under the threat of the club’s expulsion. The FIGC also banned MCOs and gave other existing owners until 2024/25 to sell their stakes.

In Denmark, where eight clubs are part of MCO operations, the Danish Football Union (DBU) launched a review into the trend last year and recently announced tighter rules on ownership, although they fell short of banning MCOs.

UEFA – which already bans matches between clubs in a MCO group – has so far resisted calls for
increased regulation on MCOs.

But would be and existing investors might find themselves faced with an even more potent and serious challenge: fans.

Fan rising

Across Europe, a rising backlash is facing MCOs. In the Netherlands, City Football Group (CFG) were last month forced to abandon a takeover of second tier club, NAC Breda. Also last month in France, protests at Paris FC’s prospective takeover by 777 Partners saw a match against FC Sete 34 abandoned.

Pacific Media Group (PMG) – Paul Conway’s vehicle, which as stakes in Barnsley, Esbjerg FB, AS Nancy, KV Oostende, Den Bosch, and FC Thun – has faced protests from across its group’s supporters.

Pacific disaster

PMG’s clubs have faced a particularly disastrous 2021/22 season, with clubs under its ownership going for an unwanted treble: Barnsley and AS Nancy have been relegated to their country’s third divisions and there is a strong chance Esbjerg will follow them. (FC Thun and Den Bosch are mid-table in Switzerland and Netherlands’ second tiers, Oostende came 12th in Belgium’s top tier).

Barnsley

At Barnsley, where Chien Lee and Paul Conway are co-chairmen, a spokesperson for the Conway Out! campaign group tells Off The Pitch that it has been “a record breaking terrible season.”

They say that concerns about being part of a multi group model were initially overlooked “due to our excitement that we were bought by a consortium with a net worth of £9 billion.”

Billy Beane, the legendary baseball executive of “Moneyball” fame is also a Barnsley shareholder. But the Conway Out group say that the Moneyball football decisions have been disastrous for the club. They allege that the style of play that got Barnsley to last year’s play offs was changed “because there wasn’t enough interest in our players due to our direct style.” They claim this was adopted so the owners “could sell our players for more profit.”

The benefits of being part of a MCO have been at best opaque. “The only real effect on us is that some of our younger players have been loaned out to Esbjerg and a few of our players who weren't good enough were transferred to Nancy and Oostende. But apart from that, there hasn't been any other effects yet.”

The spokesperson added: “I’d love to think that this is just an exception, and one bad season at Barnsley due to a few bad decisions due to the ownership group. Unfortunately, we aren't the only club in the ownership group that have been relegated this season, with Nancy officially relegated and Esbjerg on the brink of relegation.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/