Skip to main content

United's three quarters of a billion interest bill

 Manchester United have announced financial results for Q3 of 2021/22, incorporating the first nine months of the season (July 2021 to March 2022), so these are boosted by the return of fans to the

The club have reported operating losses for the past two seasons, so it is no huge surprise to see another deficit in the first nine months of 2021/22. That said, the £44m operating loss is significantly more than the £0.5m lost in the same period last season.

Interest payments and dividends

Although it has fallen from its peak, the annual interest payment of about £20m is still a lot higher than every other Premier League club except Arsenal £34m (£32m break fee for debt refinancing) and Spurs £18m (new stadium).   United have now paid an amazing three-quarters of a billion pounds in interest since the Glazers leveraged buy-out, while the debt owed is virtually unchanged at around £600m.

Interest went from went from £18m receivable in 2021 to £31m payable in 2022, an adverse movement of £49m, largely due to an unfavourable swing in unrealised foreign exchange movements on the club’s debt, which is denominated in USD, compared to prior year favourable swing.

The club have found enough cash to pay shareholders (mainly the Glazers) a £22m dividend, including £11m delayed from 2020/21. Another £11m semi-annual dividend will be paid on 24 June, taking year to £33m. United are the only Premier League club to pay dividends (£155m since 2016).

Revenue

United swung from £18m pre-tax profit to £58m loss (£45m after tax), despite revenue increasing £65m (16%) from £400m to £465m and profit on player sales rising from £0.3m to £18m, as expenses were up £109m (27%) and net interest went from £18m recoverable to £31m payable.

The main driver of the £65m revenue increase was match day, which rose £84m from £5m to £89m, as games no longer played behind closed doors, though commercial was also up £14m (8%) from £180m to £194m. In contrast, broadcasting fell £34m (16%) from £215m to £181m.

Profit from player sales rose from just £259k to £18m, thanks to the sale of Dan James to Leeds and a sell-on fee from Romelu Lukaku’s transfer from Inter to Chelsea. This is not that big by Premier League standards, but is more than twice as much as the 2020/21 full year £7m.

Although it is clearly good news that revenue increased from £400m to £465m, it has still not returned to the £496m pre-pandemic level for the first 9 months. This suggests that United are unlikely to reach the club’s 2019 revenue peak of £627m this season.

On a full year basis the Swiss Ramble estimates that the club will receive slightly less money from Europe this season, with £67m for reaching the Champions League last 16 compared to £70m in 2020/21 (Champions League group stage £54m plus Europa League finalists £16m).

Commercial income rose £14m (8%) from £180m to £194m, due to merchandising rising by £13m (19%) to £84m, thanks to “increased Megastore footfall” (aided by the Ronaldo factor), with sponsorship up slightly to £111m. No pre-season tour possible.   This was still below 2020 £220m peak.

Wages

Wages shot up £49m (21%) from £239m to £288m, as a result of signing Ronaldo, Varane and Sancho, which works out to £384m on an annualised basis. This is in line with the club’s estimate of a 20% year-on-year increase to £387m, which would be the highest ever in England.

wages to turnover for first 9 months of 2021/22 was 62%, which is lower (better) than 65% in full year 2020/21, though still the second worst ratio that United have reported (and significantly higher than 45% in 2017), driven by higher wages and low revenue growth.

The net debt has increased by £76m in the last 9 months to around half a billion, as gross debt rose £62m to £592m and cash fell £15m to £96m. Took out new £40m loan, while US Dollar denominated borrowings were higher in GBP terms, due to foreign exchange movements.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/