Skip to main content

Why did Ratcliffe Chelsea bid fail and what now?

It’s not every day that investment bankers give the “cold shoulder” to one of the world’s richest men.  But merchant bank Raine Group refused to entertain a last-gasp offer for Chelsea from Jim Ratcliffe, founder of petrochemicals company Ineos, who has lined up £4.25bn to acquire and fund the football club.

Instead, Raine has gone with US financier Todd Boehly and investment firm Clearlake Capital, backed by Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss.

So why did Ineos’s “British bid, for a British club” fail to make the grade?  For starters, Ratcliffe was late to the party. Too late, it would appear, having dodged the formal process that opened when oligarch Roman Abramovich confirmed he was selling the west London club soon after Russia invaded Ukraine.

It doesn’t help that Ineos has a history of questioning if Chelsea is worth the money, baulking at an asking price of more than £2bn in 2018 when Abramovich ultimately opted against selling. Ratcliffe also turned down the opportunity to bid ahead of earlier deadlines in this year’s auction.

Ineos director Tom Crotty told the Financial Times  ‘Scoreboard’  that the group’s sense of the price range was “a lot more sensible” than expected. He also pointed to increases in the value of the English Premier League’s international broadcast deals, which are expected to generate more than £10bn over the next three seasons.

“The numbers make sense,” he says. “We put the bid in and that’s it really, I suppose you can say we’ve had the cold shoulder.”

But the crux of it really comes down to leverage. Raine took three sets of deep-pocketed investors to the final stage of the auction, with two ready to step up in the event that Boehly’s group withdrew.

Allowing Ineos to crash the party risked driving the shortlisted bidders away. That’s far from ideal given that negotiations with Ratcliffe were not guaranteed to result in a deal.

Still, Ineos isn’t minded to go away and keeps waving the Union Jack.  “We don’t tend to give up on things too easily,” said Crotty. “Until this is a finished deal we’ll probably keep reminding people we’re offering an option.”

Could Ratcliffe return to his interest in the club he supported in his youth, Manchester United?   His explanation is that the club is not for sale.   However, if he put £4.25 billion on the deal might the Glazers be interested, particularly given the need to spend money on updating the stadium and the training ground, as well as on the squad?  

Replacing an American franchise operation by 'British' ownership at a top club would be great PR.  It is also generally felt that top British clubs are under valued given the ability to make more from the matchday 'experience', branding and streaming rights.  Watch this space.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day ...

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...