Skip to main content

Relegation has less of a financial sting for Hornets

Watford should be able to deal with the drop to the Championship better than following previous relegations.  One part of the post-relegation coping strategy is an intrinsic part of the Pozzo model: player sales. The other is something new, and perhaps evidence of a lesson learned: not being lumbered with high wages in the second tier.

The big change this summer is the financial protection afforded by the vast majority of the squad having significant wage cuts built into their contracts. It is understood up to 80 per cent of the playing staff will see a reduction of 50 per cent in their basic salaries, with the squad’s lower earners seeing a drop of only around 30 per cent.

As Watford only spent one season back in the Premier League (as opposed to five prior to that relegation) they only get two years of parachute payments this time around. That roughly equates to 55 per cent of the basic award (of approximately £100 million) in year one and 45 per cent in year two. Clubs who stay in the top division for more than one season get a final payment in year three at 20 per cent.

The fact that the club have been relegated again means that, while outside investment would come in handy, it’s not deemed the best time to negotiate. Informal discussions have taken place with various parties in recent years — including one with Mexican football group Orlegi — but internally, it’s accepted that seeking external help from a partner needs to be brokered at the right time.

In November, a £50 million loan was taken out with the Macquarie bank, which could be absorbed by a third-party investor if they wanted to come on board, but it’s likely that getting people to the table when Watford are upwardly mobile rather than down in the doldrums may be a smarter negotiating position.

The controversial sponsorship deal signed last year with crypto betting firm Stake.com saw the club earn £5 million up front, with further bonuses due depending on their performance in the Premier League and other competitions. If they’d stayed up, that is likely to have exceeded £6 million, but focusing on what the deal is now worth in the second tier is clearly more pertinent after a disappointing season.

 It’s understood that — although part of the club’s 2022-23 budget — Watford will now receive closer to £1 million for the forthcoming season. It highlights the instant drop in revenue that comes with relegation.

The number of season tickets sold has already surpassed 12,000, with the target remaining above 14,000. Although the capacity is 21,000, the club are required to set a large chunk of tickets aside for away supporters and hospitality sales.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/