Skip to main content

Brentford and Brighton get value for money from players

In football money often talks, i.e. success on the pitch is almost invariably reserved for clubs that have spent the most on wages and transfer fees. However, the authoritative Swiss Ramble considers might be interesting to see which clubs have performed the best (and indeed worst) relative to their budget.

Looking at wages per point, the clubs with best value for money were Brighton £2.1m, West Ham £2.3m, Newcastle United £2.4m and Burnley £2.5m. Brentford are also likely to be one of the best even after their wages increased in the PL. In contrast,  Man United £5.6m, Everton £4.7m and Chelsea £4.5m by far the worst.

Another way of ranking clubs’ performance is wages per league position.    On this basis, the same clubs do best: Brentford, Brighton, West Ham and Newcastle, though worth noting Tottenham Hostpur’s impressive performance in 5th place. The three relegated clubs look bad on this metric, but this also highlights underperformance by Leeds and particularly Everton.

Excluding clubs promoted from the Championship, the clubs with the cheapest squad cost per point were Burnley and Brighton (both £3.6m), followed by Leeds £4.4m. Four clubs were higher than £10m: Man United £14.8m, Chelsea £13.0m, Everton £11.6m and Man City £10.5m.

The real stand-out for squad cost per league position is unfortunately Everton with £90.2m, which is almost exactly six times as much as Brighton £15.3m. Last placed Norwich were worst with £93.5m, but the next highest were Man United £57.4m and Chelsea £53.3m.

We can say that the clubs who get most “bang for their buck” are Brentford and Brighton.   At the other end of the spectrum,  the worst performing clubs in the Premier League, relative to money spent, were *drum roll* Everton and Manchester United, though this will surely not come as news to their supporters.

Clearly, many fans will say that the only measurement that counts is the number of trophies won by their club, but it is instructive to see which clubs outperform their budget. It looks like the data-driven strategy employed by Brentford and Brighton has worked pretty well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/